Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to MajesteitBart/TalentMatcher. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MajesteitBart/TalentMatcher/main/.claude/agents/design-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MajesteitBart/TalentMatcherWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/majesteitbart/talentmatcher/design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/majesteitbart/talentmatcher/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/majesteitbart/talentmatcher/design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/majesteitbart/talentmatcher/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/majesteitbart/talentmatcher/design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00117 | $0.01433 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.00717 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00287 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 120 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A 0dd9cc5dc484
design-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository MajesteitBart/TalentMatcher (2 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 1,433 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
fe-a11y-auditor
Specialized accessibility (a11y) audit — semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast, focus management. More precise than fe-reviewer's a11y axis. READ-ONLY. With --live, also measures via Chrome DevTools MCP (Lighthouse a11y score, real accessibility tree, runtime console); falls back to static analysis…
fe-vision
Precisely extracts layout, components, color, and typography from a single screen in Figma, screenshots, UI mockups, design drafts, or PDF/PPT (via conversion) — extraction mode. Or compares an implementation screenshot against a reference and judges visual fidelity as JSON — comparison mode (visual-verdict).…
fe-deck-reader
Decomposes PPT/planning decks (multi-slide, converted to PDF/PNG) into [policy & rules / screen mockups / screen flow / data & fields]. Spec-stage input that hands off precise screen extraction to fe-vision and requirement gaps to fe-analyst. READ-ONLY.
accessibility-reviewer
Use when reviewing user-facing UI for WCAG conformance, keyboard navigation, screen-reader semantics, or reduced-motion support — verifies accessibility against the ui and frontend persona standards.
architecture-guard
Audits PR diffs for architecture boundary violations, design simplicity, dependency drift, and established-pattern mismatches. Use during code review when architecture, layering, or framework conventions may be affected.
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.