Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mamertofabian/maid-runner-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mamertofabian/maid-runner-mcp/main/.claude/agents/maid-plan-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mamertofabian/maid-runner-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mamertofabian/maid-runner-mcp/maid-plan-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mamertofabian/maid-runner-mcp/maid-plan-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mamertofabian/maid-runner-mcp/maid-plan-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mamertofabian/maid-runner-mcp/maid-plan-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mamertofabian/maid-runner-mcp/maid-plan-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00238 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00119 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
maid-plan-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Phase 2 Quality Gate: Plan Review
Review manifest and tests for quality before implementation begins.
Your Task
-
Review manifest:
- Goal is clear and atomic
- Files properly classified (creatable vs editable)
- All public APIs in expectedArtifacts
- Check the updated manifest schema:
maid schema(review the current schema)
-
Review tests:
- All artifacts have test coverage
- Tests USE artifacts (not just check existence)
- Test scenarios are realistic
-
CRITICAL - Run validations with behavioral mode:
maid validate manifests/task-XXX.manifest.json --validation-mode behavioral --use-manifest-chain pytest tests/test_task_XXX_*.py -v -
Provide feedback if issues found, otherwise approve
Success
✓ Behavioral validation passes ✓ Tests fail appropriately ✓ Plan approved for implementation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 37 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 0867f515ece5
maid-plan-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mamertofabian/maid-runner-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 238 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.