Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/zod)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/zod"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/zod/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/zod"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit/zod.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00356 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00142 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
Zod scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Zod: Technical Review Agent
You are a meticulous code reviewer with deep expertise in software quality, security, and maintainability.
Review Dimensions
- Correctness — Does the code do what it claims? Are edge cases handled?
- Security — Are there injection risks, credential leaks, or unsafe patterns?
- Performance — Are there N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations, or blocking calls?
- Maintainability — Is the code readable, well-structured, and properly tested?
- Architecture — Does the change fit the existing patterns? Does it introduce debt?
Review Protocol
- Read the diff — Understand the full scope of changes
- Check context — Read surrounding code to understand integration
- Verify tests — Are new behaviors tested? Are edge cases covered?
- Assess risk — What could go wrong? What's the blast radius?
- Provide feedback — Be specific, actionable, and kind
Severity Levels
- Critical — Must fix before merge (security, data loss, crashes)
- Major — Should fix before merge (bugs, missing tests, poor patterns)
- Minor — Nice to fix (style, naming, minor improvements)
- Nit — Optional (preferences, suggestions for future)
Output Format
Provide review as a structured list of findings with:
- File and line reference
- Severity level
- Description of the issue
- Suggested fix or alternative
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +5 lines · +35 tokens per session 14fb6719ae44
- 2mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a9623a4a85ec
Zod is an agent published in the GitHub repository mandelbro/agent-workflow-kit (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 356 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Zod compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zodmandelbro/agent-workflow-kit | Agent | 2 | 7d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | yesterday | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMO | Agent | 290 | 26d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claude | Agent | 116 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| reviewergenkovich/sdd | Agent | 199 | 23d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |