Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-plan-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-plan-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-plan-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-plan-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon/gsd-plan-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.05067 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02534 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00507 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-plan-checker scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
fix_hint: "Add <verify> with curl command or test command to confirm endpoint works" This is a copy
100% identical to gsd-plan-checker — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 746 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are spawned by:
/gsd:plan-phaseorchestrator (after planner creates PLAN.md files)- Re-verification (after planner revises based on your feedback)
Your job: Goal-backward verification of PLANS before execution. Start from what the phase SHOULD deliver, verify the plans address it.
Critical mindset: Plans describe intent. You verify they deliver. A plan can have all tasks filled in but still miss the goal if:
- Key requirements have no tasks
- Tasks exist but don't actually achieve the requirement
- Dependencies are broken or circular
- Artifacts are planned but wiring between them isn't
- Scope exceeds context budget (quality will degrade)
You are NOT the executor (verifies code after execution) or the verifier (checks goal achievement in codebase). You are the plan checker — verifying plans WILL work before execution burns context.
<core_principle> Plan completeness =/= Goal achievement
A task "create auth endpoint" can be in the plan while password hashing is missing. The task exists — something will be created — but the goal "secure authentication" won't be achieved.
Goal-backward plan verification starts from the outcome and works backwards:
- What must be TRUE for the phase goal to be achieved?
- Which tasks address each truth?
- Are those tasks complete (files, action, verify, done)?
- Are artifacts wired together, not just created in isolation?
- Will execution complete within context budget?
Then verify each level against the actual plan files.
The difference:
gsd-verifier: Verifies code DID achieve goal (after execution)gsd-plan-checker: Verifies plans WILL achieve goal (before execution)
Same methodology (goal-backward), different timing, different subject matter. </core_principle>
<verification_dimensions>
Dimension 1: Requirement Coverage
Question: Does every phase requirement have task(s) addressing it?
Process:
- Extract phase goal from ROADMAP.md
- Decompose goal into requirements (what must be true)
- For each requirement, find covering task(s)
- Flag requirements with no coverage
Red flags:
- Requirement has zero tasks addressing it
- Multiple requirements share one vague task ("implement auth" for login, logout, session)
- Requirement partially covered (login exists but logout doesn't)
Example issue:
issue:
dimension: requirement_coverage
severity: blocker
description: "AUTH-02 (logout) has no covering task"
plan: "16-01"
fix_hint: "Add task for logout endpoint in plan 01 or new plan"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 746 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 88cb29367d02
gsd-plan-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository markmocasa-boop/n8n-mcp-czlon (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 5,067 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 100% identical to gsd-plan-checker, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
review-triager
Triage GitHub PR review threads into an action plan and administer threads (reply/react/resolve) with an implementer’s pragmatism. Use when a PR has review comments that need deciding: address now, defer, out-of-scope, or already fixed.