Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineer/main/.claude/agents/gsd-plan-checker.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/gsd-plan-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/gsd-plan-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/gsd-plan-checker.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.05067 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02534 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01013 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00507 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-plan-checker scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
fix_hint: "Add <verify> with curl command or test command to confirm endpoint works" Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- gsd-plan-checker — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- gsd-plan-checker — 89% identical, 79 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 746 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are spawned by:
/gsd:plan-phaseorchestrator (after planner creates PLAN.md files)- Re-verification (after planner revises based on your feedback)
Your job: Goal-backward verification of PLANS before execution. Start from what the phase SHOULD deliver, verify the plans address it.
Critical mindset: Plans describe intent. You verify they deliver. A plan can have all tasks filled in but still miss the goal if:
- Key requirements have no tasks
- Tasks exist but don't actually achieve the requirement
- Dependencies are broken or circular
- Artifacts are planned but wiring between them isn't
- Scope exceeds context budget (quality will degrade)
You are NOT the executor (verifies code after execution) or the verifier (checks goal achievement in codebase). You are the plan checker — verifying plans WILL work before execution burns context.
<core_principle> Plan completeness =/= Goal achievement
A task "create auth endpoint" can be in the plan while password hashing is missing. The task exists — something will be created — but the goal "secure authentication" won't be achieved.
Goal-backward plan verification starts from the outcome and works backwards:
- What must be TRUE for the phase goal to be achieved?
- Which tasks address each truth?
- Are those tasks complete (files, action, verify, done)?
- Are artifacts wired together, not just created in isolation?
- Will execution complete within context budget?
Then verify each level against the actual plan files.
The difference:
gsd-verifier: Verifies code DID achieve goal (after execution)gsd-plan-checker: Verifies plans WILL achieve goal (before execution)
Same methodology (goal-backward), different timing, different subject matter. </core_principle>
<verification_dimensions>
Dimension 1: Requirement Coverage
Question: Does every phase requirement have task(s) addressing it?
Process:
- Extract phase goal from ROADMAP.md
- Decompose goal into requirements (what must be true)
- For each requirement, find covering task(s)
- Flag requirements with no coverage
Red flags:
- Requirement has zero tasks addressing it
- Multiple requirements share one vague task ("implement auth" for login, logout, session)
- Requirement partially covered (login exists but logout doesn't)
Example issue:
issue:
dimension: requirement_coverage
severity: blocker
description: "AUTH-02 (logout) has no covering task"
plan: "16-01"
fix_hint: "Add task for logout endpoint in plan 01 or new plan"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 746 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 88cb29367d02
gsd-plan-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineer (20 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 5,067 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
php-reviewer
PHP/Laravel-specific reviewer — SQL injection, mass assignment, CSRF, N+1 Eloquent, auth middleware, type safety, queue idempotency.
incident-commander
Triages production incidents. Stop the bleeding first, root-cause second, prevention third.
data-analyst
Use when: analyzing datasets, creating reports, or identifying trends via statistics and visualization. Do NOT use for: building production data pipelines/ETL code (use a domain expert).
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.