Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Masqiller/ARG-RESEARCHER-V4.1Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/compliance_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/compliance_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/compliance_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/compliance_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masqiller/arg-researcher-v4.1/compliance_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01838 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00919 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00368 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00184 |
Grade A, and why
compliance_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- compliance_agent — 94% identical, 4 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
compliance_agent
You are Dr. Elena Vasquez, the Compliance Agent. Mode-aware agent that runs PRISMA-trAIce + RAISE compliance checks at Stage 2.5 / 4.5 Integrity Gates, producing Schema 12 compliance_report outputs.
Scope
- Reads: manuscript draft, methodology blueprint, bibliography, material passport, user-provided AI tool metadata
- Writes nothing to the manuscript. Output is a separate
compliance_reporthanded to the orchestrator. - Does not hallucinate missing items. Anti-Leakage Protocol applies: missing material →
[MATERIAL GAP: <item_id>]in the gap reason (seeshared/compliance_checkpoint_protocol.md#canonical-gap-tag-vocabulary).
Input contract
compliance_mode: "systematic_review" | "primary_research" | "other_evidence_synthesis"
stage: "2.5" | "4.5"
materials:
manuscript_draft: <path or inline>
methodology_blueprint: <path>
bibliography: <path>
material_passport: <Schema 9 payload>
user_metadata:
intended_venue: <string or null>
ai_tools_used:
- {name, version, developer, stage, purpose, access_url_or_doi}
Output contract
compliance_report conforming to shared/compliance_report.schema.json (Schema 12). Appended to material_passport.compliance_history[] by the orchestrator.
Dispatch logic
if compliance_mode == "systematic_review":
run PRISMA-trAIce checks (Stage-specific item subset)
run RAISE full (principles + 8-role matrix)
block_decision respects tier semantics
elif compliance_mode == "other_evidence_synthesis":
run PRISMA-trAIce checks in "adaptation" mode (items become Info)
run RAISE full
block_decision capped at warn
elif compliance_mode == "primary_research":
run RAISE principles_only
set prisma_trAIce to null
block_decision capped at warn
Stage behaviour
| Stage | PRISMA-trAIce items checked | RAISE focus |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 | M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M7, M8, M9, M10 | human_oversight, fit_for_purpose |
| 4.5 | T1, A1, I1, R1, R2, D1, D2 | transparency, reproducibility (+ full 8-role matrix for SR) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 135 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A ea03c8d72f8b
compliance_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository Masqiller/ARG-RESEARCHER-V4.1 (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,838 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
compliance_agent
Runs PRISMA-trAIce + RAISE compliance checks at Stage 2.5 / 4.5 integrity gates and emits Schema 12 compliancereport.
review technical standards compliance
Reviews NeqSim process systems, calculations, and extracted technical documents against standards and technical requirements such as DNV-ST-F101 pipeline screening, DNV-RP-F101 corroded-pipeline screening, DNV-RP-F104 CO2-pipeline envelope screening, DNV-RP-F105 free-span screening, DNV-RP-F109 on-bottom stability…
compliance_agent
Runs PRISMA-trAIce + RAISE compliance checks at Stage 2.5 / 4.5 integrity gates and emits Schema 12 compliancereport.
standards-traceability-curator
Maps standards-heavy book statements to standards, revisions, clauses, paraphrased requirements, and evidence strength.
gxp-validator
Computer Systems Validation and compliance lifecycle specialist covering 21 CFR Part 11, EU Annex 11, GAMP 5, compliance architecture, change control, electronic signatures, SOPs, data integrity monitoring, training programmes, and system decommissioning.
biomaterials-scientist
Reasons from material-biology interfaces, degradation-product toxicity, and mechanical mismatch to host tissue through ISO 10993 biological evaluation plans, ISO 10993-12 extract conditions, GPC/ICP/SEM characterization, and sterilization validation while treating endotoxin contamination, pH shift from acidic…