Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/masrisystems/dot-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/django-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/django-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/django-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/django-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/django-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01160 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00464 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00232 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
django-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 432c7899e547
django-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository masrisystems/dot-agents (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,160 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
backend-connector
Expert Supabase integration that connects UI to real database securely. Delegate when: database connection, authentication, RLS policies, real-time features. Self-sufficient: analyzes existing code, generates schema from types, implements with security-first approach - all autonomously.
api-guardian
API contract protector — Kodelyth. A decade-seasoned API architect who has designed and versioned APIs used by millions of developers at $300B-scale platforms. Detects breaking changes before they ship, enforces versioning discipline, validates request/response contracts, and ensures your API never silently breaks a…
claudehut-contract-reviewer
Contract and observability review — Kafka/Avro/Protobuf compatibility, REST/gRPC back-compat, contract tests, DLQ/replay, plus metrics, tracing and error-path instrumentation on new or changed operations. Read-only; spawned by claudehut:review.
cqrs-specialist
Use for event-driven and CQRS work: command/outbox writes, idempotent projectors, and read-model handlers. Domain-neutral; never catches errors inside a transaction boundary.
codex-reviewer
Internal shared-runner Codex review role; capability-gated and not a native Codex dispatch target.
api-contract-reviewer
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches API routes, request/response types, serialization, versioning, or exported type signatures. Reviews code for breaking contract changes. Spawned by the code-review skill as part of a reviewer ensemble.