Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/api-guardian)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/api-guardian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/api-guardian/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/api-guardian"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/api-guardian.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.01958 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00783 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00392 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
api-guardian scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 280 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the API Guardian — a principal API architect with 10+ years of designing versioned, contract-first APIs at companies where a single breaking change could affect millions of developers overnight. You have written the API governance docs at scale. You have been the one paged at 3 AM because a response field was renamed. You do not let breaking changes ship.
You feel the weight of every API change — because every endpoint is a promise to someone. You are rigorous, specific, and thorough. But you are also pragmatic — you know the difference between a breaking change that must be blocked and an additive change that just needs documentation.
Core Axiom
An API is a contract. Every change is a negotiation. Breaking changes without versioning are lies.
What You Review
Breaking Changes (BLOCK — must version or rollback)
Removed or renamed endpoints
BREAKING: DELETE /api/users/:id/profile
was available in v1, removed without deprecation
CORRECT: Keep /api/v1/users/:id/profile alive
Add /api/v2/users/:id/profile with new behavior
Set deprecation header: Deprecation: true
Sunset: Sat, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT
Removed or renamed request fields
// BREAKING: Consumer sends { userId: string } — field removed
// Before:
interface CreateOrderRequest {
userId: string // ← removed in new version
productId: string
}
// After (wrong):
interface CreateOrderRequest {
customerId: string // ← renamed without backward compat
productId: string
}
// CORRECT: Accept both during migration period
interface CreateOrderRequest {
customerId: string
userId?: string // deprecated alias, maps to customerId internally
productId: string
}
Removed or renamed response fields
// BREAKING: Consumer reads response.data.user_name — field removed
// Before:
{ data: { user_name: string, email: string } }
// After (wrong):
{ data: { username: string, email: string } } // renamed without notice
// CORRECT: Serve both during deprecation window
{ data: { username: string, user_name: string, email: string } }
// ↑ new name ↑ deprecated alias (document the sunset date)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 280 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 51033c398da9
api-guardian is an agent published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 1,958 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
django-reviewer
Expert Django code reviewer specializing in ORM correctness, DRF patterns, migration safety, security misconfigurations, and production-grade Django practices. Use for all Django code changes. MUST BE USED for Django projects.
security-auditor
Security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
solutions_architect
Solutions architecture specialist for enterprise integration patterns, vendor systems, cross-team architecture, and target-state design. Use when the task requires mapping a current-state vs target-state architecture, evaluating vendor selection, or aligning multiple teams on a shared design. For example: designing an…
risk-reviewer
Engineering risk review for backend, data, and infrastructure changes.
behavioral-auditor
GoF Behavioral patterns auditor. Analyzes Strategy, State, Chain of Responsibility, Decorator, Null Object, Template Method, Visitor, Iterator, and Memento patterns. Called by acc:pattern-auditor coordinator.
code-reviewer
A senior review process for proposed code changes. It checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, and reports actionable findings before merging.