Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/fsharp-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/masrisystems/dot-agentsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01026 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00513 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
fsharp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 88 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 5852f8e9beb1
fsharp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository masrisystems/dot-agents (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,026 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
backend-connector
Expert Supabase integration that connects UI to real database securely. Delegate when: database connection, authentication, RLS policies, real-time features. Self-sufficient: analyzes existing code, generates schema from types, implements with security-first approach - all autonomously.
dev-builder
Expert development engineer that adds logic, state management, and API integrations. Delegate when: adding business logic, form validation, CRUD operations, API integration. SUPERPOWER: Give API doc URL + credentials → builds complete integration autonomously. Self-sufficient: analyzes code, reads external docs…
ui-builder
Expert UI builder that creates complete, production-ready user interfaces immediately. Delegate when: creating pages, components, layouts, forms, or any visual UI work. Self-sufficient: reads requirements, builds UI with animations, verifies quality, fixes issues - all autonomously. Premium mode: multi-page…
design-reviewer
Design lead + expert design critic. Two modes: Mode A — authors the project's root DESIGN.md (design identity) at project start. Mode B — reviews built UI against DESIGN.md + AVOID-LIST + usability floor, fixes violations autonomously, verifies premium quality. Delegate when: a UI project has no DESIGN.md yet, UI…
platform-adapter
Doc-driven platform integration agent. Converts web apps to LINE MINI App (LIFF SDK), PWA (Next.js), and Capacitor (iOS/Android); Expo & Tauri are secondary/legacy. Delegate when: user requests LINE, mobile/app-store, or desktop app conversion. Always pulls current official docs before writing platform code — no…
test-runner
Automated testing specialist with auto-fix loop until all tests pass. Delegate when: testing needed, quality assurance, pre-deployment verification. Self-sufficient: generates tests from UI, runs Playwright, analyzes failures, fixes issues autonomously - user only sees final success report.