Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/masrisystems/dot-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/pr-test-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/pr-test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/pr-test-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/pr-test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/pr-test-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00411 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00205 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
pr-test-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 55 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 5432aaf7e5fc
pr-test-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository masrisystems/dot-agents (0 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 411 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-runner
Automated testing specialist with auto-fix loop until all tests pass. Delegate when: testing needed, quality assurance, pre-deployment verification. Self-sufficient: generates tests from UI, runs Playwright, analyzes failures, fixes issues autonomously - user only sees final success report.
bf-replay-auditor
For every fixture specclaw-bf-replay compare marked as a BEHAVIOURAL divergence, searches decisions.md for a decided CQ that explicitly sanctions that exact divergence, and cites it — or says plainly that none exists. Representation-only differences (raw exception type/message) are never put to this agent. Runs inside…
qa-tester
The QA Tester of the aSPARK team. Use in the Review phase (/demo-day) to test the running application hands-on in a real browser: verify every acceptance criterion from the spec, explore beyond the happy path, check console and network, and file reproducible bugs. Requires a browser integration (Claude in Chrome…
extractor
Use when the parity-test-e pipeline needs to read a changelog markdown file and extract per-version breaking changes and new features for the formatter step.
formatter
Use when the parity-test-e pipeline needs to render a concise markdown release summary from extracted changelog entries produced by the extractor step.
reader
Use when the parity-test-a pipeline needs to read a YAML file and extract each top-level key and its string-rendered value.