Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/masrisystems/dot-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/react-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/react-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/react-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/react-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/masrisystems/dot-agents/react-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01280 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00512 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00256 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
react-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A d1c43ed931ce
react-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository masrisystems/dot-agents (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,280 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
.NET Upgrade
Perform janitorial tasks on C#/.NET code including cleanup, modernization, and tech debt remediation.
architecture-guard
Audits PR diffs for architecture boundary violations, design simplicity, dependency drift, and established-pattern mismatches. Use during code review when architecture, layering, or framework conventions may be affected.
react-specialist
Expert consultant for React ecosystem development, providing code review, architecture guidance, and best practices recommendations without writing code. Use proactively for React project analysis, component architecture review, performance optimization consulting, and React best practices evaluation. When you prompt…
party-visionary
Review panelist for long-horizon design commitments. Read-only.
review
Holistic review of all changes — correctness, consistency, style, test coverage. Runs tests, checks console, verifies integration. Returns pass/fail report.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist. Proactively reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use immediately after writing or modifying code. MUST BE USED for all code changes.