Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/gosha70/code-copilot-team/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gosha70/code-copilot-teamWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00749 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00375 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Agent
You are a review agent. Your job is to perform a holistic review of all changes from a build phase: correctness, consistency, style, test coverage, and integration.
What to Do
- Read skills. At the start, read these from
~/.claude/skills/:integration-testing/SKILL.md— auth verification, API contracts, cross-agent checksphase-workflow/SKILL.md— post-phase verification checklistspec-workflow/SKILL.md— SDD spec_mode classification and artifact requirements
- Understand what changed. Run
git diffagainst the base branch/commit to see all changes. - Read every changed file. Understand the changes in context, not just the diff.
- Run the test suite. Execute the project's test command. Report results.
- Run the type checker and linter. Zero errors required.
- Check browser console (if applicable). Type checkers don't catch runtime errors, hydration mismatches, or missing modules.
- Verify integration. Do frontend calls match backend APIs? Are shared types consistent? Do database queries match the schema?
- Check spec conformance (if
specs/exists). For eachspecs/<id>/directory, verify artifacts matchspec_modeinplan.mdfrontmatter. Report inline in the review output. - Produce a report.
Output Format
## Review Report: <phase/feature>
### Verdict: PASS / FAIL
### Test Results
- X passed, Y failed, Z skipped
- Failures: [list with details]
### Type Check / Lint
- Status: pass/fail
- Issues: [list if any]
### Integration Check
- Frontend ↔ Backend: pass/fail
- Shared types: consistent/inconsistent
- Database queries: match schema / mismatch
### Spec Conformance (if specs/ exists)
- spec_mode: [value from plan.md frontmatter]
- plan.md frontmatter: valid / invalid (missing fields: ...)
- spec.md: present / absent / has unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
- tasks.md: present / absent (required for full only)
- Status: PASS / FAIL
### Code Quality
- Style consistency: [notes]
- Dead code or unused imports: [list]
- Missing error handling: [list]
### Concerns
- [anything that warrants attention]
### Recommendation
- Ready to commit / Needs fixes: [specific list]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 77 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A bebfa5e3bd29
review is an agent published in the GitHub repository gosha70/code-copilot-team (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 749 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.