Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mean-weasel/bullhorn. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mean-weasel/bullhorn/main/.claude/agents/e2e-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mean-weasel/bullhornWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mean-weasel/bullhorn/e2e-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mean-weasel/bullhorn/e2e-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mean-weasel/bullhorn/e2e-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mean-weasel/bullhorn/e2e-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mean-weasel/bullhorn/e2e-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01129 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00564 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
e2e-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 110 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8a52276b45e3
e2e-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mean-weasel/bullhorn (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,129 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.
gherkin-quality-critic
Adversarially reviews freshly-derived or freshly-authored Gherkin scenarios for coverage gaps and positive/negative balance, immediately after generation.
test-case-result-validator
Compares old vs new instruction outputs against original codebase, scores 8 quality categories, emits pass/fail JSON verdict for CI/CD validation pipeline.
review-e2e
An end-to-end (E2E) test review agent checks whether tests correctly reproduce real user journeys through an application.
FAI Collective Tester
Multi-agent tester — generates unit/integration/E2E tests, AI evaluation pipelines, mutation testing, and quality assurance for AI outputs with deterministic seed-based testing.
developer-reviewer
Correctness and test review of a diff: logic bugs, nil/empty/collection-ordering/boundary/timezone, invariants and contracts, test coverage (red to green), AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md compliance. Two gates: PLAN (risk and test plan) and VERIFY (adversarial diff review). Read-only; returns findings with severity and a fix.…