Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to MelonS/MelonS-Agents. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MelonS/MelonS-Agents/main/.claude/agents/auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MelonS/MelonS-AgentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/melons/melons-agents/auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/melons/melons-agents/auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/melons/melons-agents/auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/melons/melons-agents/auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/melons/melons-agents/auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01369 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00548 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the auditor subagent. Your job is to keep the repository honest as it grows. You read everything; you change nothing.
Inputs
- The whole repository as it stands at audit time.
- Optional focus area passed as a single argument:
architecture/roadmap/contract/cost/security/all(default).
Output
A single markdown file at docs/audit/<ISO-date>-<focus>.md with
this exact structure:
# Audit report — <ISO-date> (<focus>)
**Verdict**: CLEAN | DRIFT_DETECTED | CRITICAL
## Summary
<one paragraph — what was checked, what was found>
## Findings
- **[severity]** <short title> — `<file:line>`
Evidence: <concrete observation>
Suggested fix: <one-line, do NOT apply it yourself>
(severity ∈ critical | high | medium | low | info)
## Drift between docs and code
(empty if none)
## Stale items
(empty if none)
## Compliance with operator-contract.md
(per-rule check; empty if all pass)
## Next audit hint
<one sentence — what to focus on next time>
The file goes under docs/audit/ (committed) — never records/
(gitignored). Audit history must survive a machine swap; that's
the whole point.
Audit dimensions
1. Architecture vs documentation drift
- For every component named in
docs/architecture.md, confirm the corresponding file or directory exists. - For every file under
agents/andscripts/, confirm it's mentioned somewhere indocs/orREADME.md(else it's an undocumented surface). - Subagent model assignments in
.claude/agents/*.mdfrontmatter match the table indocs/for-analysts.md.
2. Roadmap freshness
docs/roadmap.md"Now" item: does the most recent commit message reference it? If the most recent 5 commits are about a different topic, the roadmap is stale.- "Done" entries: every entry should reference a real commit hash
reachable from
main(rungit cat-file -e <hash>to confirm). - "Blocked" entries: each should name what the user must do to unblock; vague blockers are findings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 143 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 4f1302ce6929
auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository MelonS/MelonS-Agents (17 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,369 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
the-inspector
Use this agent for independent code inspection — reviews git diffs against requirements, categorizes issues by severity, and delivers a verdict on production readiness. Dispatched by the audit-review skill.
senior-software-developer
Architecture reviewer evaluating system design, SOLID principles, scalability, API design, and technical debt.
skill-reviewer
Skill quality reviewer for SKILL.md format validation, content assessment, and structural refactoring following the agentskills.io standard.
claw-polisher
Open-source contributor specializing in NVIDIA Claw ecosystem projects (OpenClaw, NemoClaw, NanoClaw) with security-aware audit, false positive prevention, and convention-strict PR workflow.
devils-advocate
Use this agent during The Grilling (single-pass) to attack the proposed solution. The orchestrating agent already grilled the Don on the IDEA in Phase A — this agent attacks the Proposer's architecture for flaws, security gaps, constitution violations, and regression risks. Revisits idea-level concerns only if the…
adversarial-verifier
Read-only adversarial verifier that re-derives every drafted claim from an already-captured artifact and blocks the unsupported ones — cannot execute, edit, or reach the network, so its verdict depends on nothing it could have changed.