Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/refactor-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metalralf/sonarqube-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/refactor-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/refactor-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/refactor-agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00223 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 27 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 5ed679e19bde
refactor-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository metalralf/sonarqube-mcp (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 223 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
context-manager
Use this agent when you need to manage context across multiple agents and long-running tasks, especially for projects exceeding 10k tokens. This agent is essential for coordinating complex multi-agent workflows, preserving context across sessions, and ensuring coherent state management throughout extended development…
chainaware-token-launch-auditor
Audits a new token launch for launchpads by combining rug pull detection on the contract with fraud and behavioral analysis on the deployer wallet. Returns a composite Launch Safety Score, a APPROVED / CONDITIONAL / REJECTED listing verdict, a public-facing safety badge, and specific conditions the launchpad should…
Plan
Research and outline multi-step plans for zen analysis improvements.
issue-tracker
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations.
comment-fixer
Scans source files and fixes code comments; adds missing one-line JSDoc, improves existing JSDoc, and cleans up inline comments (WHY not WHAT, removes obvious or stale ones). Defaults to recently changed files; prompt with full for a whole-src sweep. Use when asked to clean up, fix, or standardize comments.
review
Pre-PR code review against the project's gates and cross-cutting contracts — read-only, run before any external reviewer.