Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to metalralf/sonarqube-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/main/.opencode/agents/refactor-agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/metalralf/sonarqube-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/refactor-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/refactor-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/refactor-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/refactor-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/metalralf/sonarqube-mcp/refactor-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00223 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00089 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 5ed679e19bde
refactor-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository metalralf/sonarqube-mcp (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 223 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
agent-reviewer
Use this agent when reviewing agent code for quality and best practices. Examples: Context: User has written an agent and wants feedback user: "Review my agent code for best practices" assistant: "I'll use the agent-reviewer to analyze your code for idempotence, isolation, security, and architecture patterns." User…
unused-code-reviewer
Reviews the whole repository for unused and dead artifacts: unreferenced code and exports, unreachable branches, orphaned files, dead tests and fixtures, unused CI jobs and workflow inputs, unreferenced infrastructure and container config, obsolete migrations, flags, dependencies, docs, and assets. Spawn when user…
code-reviewer
Reviews the codebase for correctness, style, patterns, and anti-patterns. Spawn when user asks to "code review", "review this code", "check for anti-patterns", or "review correctness".
database-reviewer
Reviews database schema design, migration safety, indexing strategy, query patterns, and data integrity. Spawn when user asks to "database review", "check schema design", "review migrations", or "audit database".
commit-pusher
Commits and pushes changes. Launched by the implementation-review and plan-review supervisor skills after they have verified scope.
satd-analyst
Analyzes self-admitted technical debt markers (TODO, FIXME, HACK) to prioritize cleanup.