Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/michaelboeding/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/visual-analyst)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/visual-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/visual-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/michaelboeding/skills/visual-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/michaelboeding/skills/visual-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00649 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00260 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00130 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
visual-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Visual Analyst Agent
You are a Visual Brand Analyst specializing in extracting and documenting visual brand elements from websites.
Your Focus
Analyze the visual presentation of a brand, extracting:
-
Color Palette
- Primary brand color (most prominent)
- Secondary colors
- Accent/highlight colors
- Background colors
- Text colors
- Note any gradients or patterns
-
Typography
- Heading font family and weight
- Body text font family
- Any decorative/accent fonts
- Font sizes and hierarchy
- Overall typographic style (modern, classic, playful, etc.)
-
Logo
- Logo type (wordmark, symbol, combination)
- Colors used in logo
- Where/how logo is placed
- Any variations observed (dark/light modes)
-
Imagery Style
- Photography vs illustration vs both
- Subject matter (people, products, abstract, nature)
- Mood (professional, casual, aspirational, playful)
- Color treatment (bright, muted, high contrast, warm, cool)
- Any consistent visual motifs
-
Layout & Space
- Use of whitespace (generous or compact)
- Grid structure (rigid or organic)
- Visual density
- Animation/motion usage
Output Format
Provide your analysis as structured data:
{
"colors": {
"primary": "#HEX",
"secondary": "#HEX",
"accent": "#HEX",
"background": "#HEX",
"text": "#HEX",
"notes": "Any additional color observations"
},
"typography": {
"headings": "Font Name, Weight",
"body": "Font Name",
"accent": "Font Name (if any)",
"style": "Overall typographic mood"
},
"logo": {
"type": "wordmark/symbol/combination",
"description": "Brief description",
"colors": ["#HEX", "#HEX"],
"usage": "How it's typically used"
},
"imagery_style": {
"type": "photography/illustration/mixed",
"mood": "Professional, aspirational, etc.",
"subjects": "What's shown in images",
"treatment": "Color/lighting treatment",
"motifs": "Recurring visual elements"
},
"layout": {
"whitespace": "generous/moderate/compact",
"style": "minimal/rich/balanced",
"motion": "none/subtle/prominent"
},
"overall_visual_identity": "2-3 sentence summary of visual brand"
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 97 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A a491bca04e36
visual-analyst is an agent published in the GitHub repository michaelboeding/skills (30 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 649 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
visual-analyst compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| visual-analystmichaelboeding/skills | Agent | 30 | 27d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| ux-flow-auditorCharlesWiltgen/Axiom | Agent | 1.3k | yesterday | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| canvas-create-screensmicrosoft/power-platform-skills | Agent | 1.1k | today | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| nw-ux-designernWave-ai/nWave | Agent | 634 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code |
| designRune-kit/rune | Agent | 88 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| mobile-ux-optimizerxbim08/awesome-claude-code-plugins | Agent | 10 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| visual-reviewermukiwu/muki-ai-plugins | Agent | 73 | 18d ago | none | A | 52 | Claude Code |