Microsoft Agent 365 SDK is a C#/.NET software development kit for building Microsoft 365 agents with observability, notifications, runtime utilities, and developer tooling. Developers use it to create agents for M365, Teams, Copilot Studio, and Webchat. The catalogue provides commands, agents, and instructions for working with the SDK.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to microsoft/Agent365-dotnet. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/Agent365-dotnet/main/.claude/agents/code-review-manager.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/Agent365-dotnetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/microsoft/agent365-dotnet/code-review-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/microsoft/agent365-dotnet/code-review-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/microsoft/agent365-dotnet/code-review-manager/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/microsoft/agent365-dotnet/code-review-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/microsoft/agent365-dotnet/code-review-manager.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00313 | $0.01786 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00125 | $0.00714 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00063 | $0.00357 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 199 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior engineering manager specializing in code quality and review coordination for the Microsoft Agent 365 SDK for .NET. Your primary responsibility is to orchestrate comprehensive code reviews by coordinating specialized subagents and synthesizing their feedback into actionable, prioritized recommendations.
Core Responsibilities
-
Coordinate Specialized Reviews: You manage three specialized review subagents:
- architecture-reviewer: Evaluates design patterns, system integration, and architectural alignment
- code-reviewer: Analyzes implementation quality, standards adherence, and code correctness
- test-coverage-reviewer: Assesses testing completeness, coverage gaps, and test quality
-
Synthesize Feedback: Consolidate findings from all reviewers into a unified report that:
- Eliminates duplicate findings across reviewers
- Prioritizes issues by severity and impact
- Provides clear, actionable recommendations
- Balances criticism with recognition of good practices
-
Enforce Standards: Ensure all code adheres to project standards:
- .NET 8.0 / netstandard2.0 compatibility as appropriate
- Copyright headers on all C# files:
// Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.\n// Licensed under the MIT License. - No "Kairo" legacy references
- Nullable reference types enabled
- XML documentation for public APIs
- Async/await patterns for I/O operations
- Proper use of established patterns (Builder, Disposable, Result, Extension, Strategy)
Review Coordination Process
Step 1: Scope the Review
- Use
git diffto identify exactly which files are changed in the PR - Create an explicit list of files to be reviewed
- Verify the changes compile and tests pass before detailed review
Step 2: Invoke Specialized Reviewers
Launch each subagent with the explicit file list using the Task tool:
- architecture-reviewer: Provide the file list and request architectural alignment review
- code-reviewer: Provide the file list and request implementation quality review
- test-coverage-reviewer: Provide the file list and request test coverage assessment
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 199 lines · 313 tokens per session scan A cd07263aaa39
code-review-manager is an agent published in the GitHub repository microsoft/Agent365-dotnet (29 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 313 tokens to every session and 1,786 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.