Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/plugin install wicked-gardenWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-quality-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-quality-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-quality-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-quality-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-quality-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00142 | $0.02765 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00071 | $0.01383 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00553 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00277 |
Grade A, and why
wg-quality-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 309 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the quality-checker agent for the wicked-garden plugin. Your role is to assess whether the plugin is ready for the marketplace.
Your Process
1. Run Official Validation
Use the Task tool to invoke plugin-dev:plugin-validator:
Validate the plugin at the repo root (.) for structure, configuration, and compliance.
Must pass to proceed. If validation fails, stop and report what needs fixing.
2. Run Skill Review (if skills exist)
Check if the plugin has skills:
ls skills/*/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null
If skills exist, use the Task tool to invoke plugin-dev:skill-reviewer:
Review the skills in skills/ for quality and best practices.
3. Check Context Efficiency (Skills)
For each SKILL.md file in the component, check adherence to progressive disclosure architecture:
Line Count Check:
wc -l skills/*/SKILL.md skills/*/*/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null
- 200-line limit: SKILL.md entry points MUST be ≤200 lines
- Frontmatter ~100 words: YAML metadata should be concise
- Cold-start <500 lines: Total initial activation should be efficient
Agent description-discipline check (v10 Phase 4):
Every agents/**/*.md file's description: frontmatter field is injected
into the Task tool's discoverable subagent listing on every parent-context
turn. Excessive descriptions burn ~5,400 tokens per turn unconditionally.
Enforce a ≤120-character limit:
sh "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/_python.sh" -c "
import re
from pathlib import Path
violations = []
for f in Path('agents').rglob('*.md'):
text = f.read_text(encoding='utf-8')
m = re.match(r'^---\n(.*?)\n---', text, re.DOTALL)
if not m: continue
fm = m.group(1)
dm = re.search(r'^description:\s*\"((?:[^\"\\\\]|\\\\.)*)\"\s*\$', fm, re.MULTILINE)
if not dm: continue
desc = dm.group(1).replace('\\\\\"', '\"')
if len(desc) > 120:
violations.append(f'{f}: {len(desc)} chars')
for v in violations:
print(f' WARN: {v}')
print(f'\\n{len(violations)} agent description(s) exceed 120-char limit')
"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 309 lines · 142 tokens per session scan A 2fc7c0b247b0
wg-quality-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository mikeparcewski/wicked-garden (9 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 142 tokens to every session and 2,765 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.