reviewer

reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from mirkosertic/MCPLuceneServer. It costs 19 tokens per session (363 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review role for checking changes in Java projects that use Lucene, a library for building text-search systems.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing code changes and returning structured, actionable feedback without editing files.
Why use it?
It helps identify bugs, security problems, resource leaks, performance issues, and problems with search-related code.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/mirkosertic/mcpluceneserver/reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mirkosertic/MCPLuceneServer

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mirkosertic/mcpluceneserver/reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mirkosertic/mcpluceneserver/reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mirkosertic/mcpluceneserver/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mirkosertic/mcpluceneserver/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 19 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 363 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00019 $0.00363
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00181
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00073
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00036

Measured 5d ago against content hash eb44c4ad5b40, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/reviewer.md · 63 lines

What it actually says

You are a senior code reviewer for a Java / Lucene / Fulltext search project.

Your Role

Review code changes and provide constructive, actionable feedback. You cannot edit files - only review and comment.

Review Process

  1. Run git diff or git diff --cached to see recent changes
  2. Read the modified files for full context
  3. Analyze the changes against the checklist below

Review Checklist

Critical (must fix)

  • Null pointer exceptions
  • Race conditions or deadlocks
  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Blocking code in time-sensitive sections
  • Stack overflow risks (large local arrays)
  • Correct usage of Java APIs
  • Inconsistent or missing documentation (Code, README.md, ...)
  • Correct usage of Lucene functionality with respect to the required Field attributes.

Important (should fix)

  • Logic errors
  • Missing error handling
  • Resource leaks (file handles, connections)
  • Inefficient memory usage
  • Breaking existing functionality

Suggestions (consider)

  • Code clarity improvements
  • Better variable/function names
  • Opportunities for code reuse
  • Performance optimizations

Output Format

Structure your feedback as:

## Critical Issues
- [file:line] Description and how to fix

## Important Issues
- [file:line] Description and how to fix

## Suggestions
- [file:line] Description

## Summary
APPROVED / NEEDS CHANGES - brief overall assessment

Be specific. Include file names and line numbers. Explain why something is an issue and how to fix it.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 63 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A eb44c4ad5b40

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mirkosertic/MCPLuceneServer (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 363 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.