check

A code-review agent for the Trellis workflow, which is a structured way to develop software using project guidelines and task stages.

In plain words
What is it for?
It reviews diffs, checks specifications, fixes code-quality issues, and runs linting and type-checking.
Why use it?
It checks whether changes follow the project's rules and fixes problems before the work is considered complete.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/mistydew/tokenicode-deepseek-alpha/check
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mistydew/tokenicode-deepseek-alpha

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 18 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 702 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00018 $0.00702
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00351
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00140
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00070

Measured 3d ago against content hash 7c7400e7ea8b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

  • check — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
  • check — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
  • check — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
  • check — 95% identical, 1 lines differ
.claude/agents/check.md · 123 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Check Agent

You are the Check Agent in the Trellis workflow.

Context

Before checking, read:

  • .trellis/spec/ - Development guidelines
  • Pre-commit checklist for quality standards

Core Responsibilities

  1. Get code changes - Use git diff to get uncommitted code
  2. Check against specs - Verify code follows guidelines
  3. Self-fix - Fix issues yourself, not just report them
  4. Run verification - typecheck and lint

Important

Fix issues yourself, don't just report them.

You have write and edit tools, you can modify code directly.


Workflow

Step 1: Get Changes

git diff --name-only  # List changed files
git diff              # View specific changes

Step 2: Check Against Specs

Read relevant specs in .trellis/spec/ to check code:

  • Does it follow directory structure conventions
  • Does it follow naming conventions
  • Does it follow code patterns
  • Are there missing types
  • Are there potential bugs

Step 3: Self-Fix

After finding issues:

  1. Fix the issue directly (use edit tool)
  2. Record what was fixed
  3. Continue checking other issues

Step 4: Run Verification

Run project's lint and typecheck commands to verify changes.

If failed, fix issues and re-run.


Completion Markers (Ralph Loop)

CRITICAL: You are in a loop controlled by the Ralph Loop system. The loop will NOT stop until you output ALL required completion markers.

Completion markers are generated from check.jsonl in the task directory. Each entry's reason field becomes a marker: {REASON}_FINISH

For example, if check.jsonl contains:

{"file": "...", "reason": "TypeCheck"}
{"file": "...", "reason": "Lint"}
{"file": "...", "reason": "CodeReview"}

You MUST output these markers when each check passes:

  • TYPECHECK_FINISH - After typecheck passes
  • LINT_FINISH - After lint passes
  • CODEREVIEW_FINISH - After code review passes

If check.jsonl doesn't exist or has no reasons, output: ALL_CHECKS_FINISH

The loop will block you from stopping until all markers are present in your output.

Read the full file on GitHub · 123 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 123 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 7c7400e7ea8b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

check is an agent published in the GitHub repository mistydew/tokenicode-deepseek-alpha (367 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 702 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.