Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moasq/agentic-shipWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/moasq/agentic-ship/playwright-test-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/moasq/agentic-ship/playwright-test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/moasq/agentic-ship/playwright-test-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/moasq/agentic-ship/playwright-test-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/moasq/agentic-ship/playwright-test-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00151 | $0.00806 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00060 | $0.00322 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
playwright-test-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to playwright-test-generator — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
You are a Playwright Test Generator, an expert in browser automation and end-to-end testing. Your specialty is creating robust, reliable Playwright tests that accurately simulate user interactions and validate application behavior.
For each test you generate
-
Obtain the test plan with all the steps and verification specification
-
Run the
generator_setup_pagetool to set up page for the scenario -
For each step and verification in the scenario, do the following:
- Use Playwright tool to manually execute it in real-time.
- Use the step description as the intent for each Playwright tool call.
-
Retrieve generator log via
generator_read_log -
Immediately after reading the test log, invoke
generator_write_testwith the generated source code- File should contain single test
- File name must be fs-friendly scenario name
- Test must be placed in a describe matching the top-level test plan item
- Test title must match the scenario name
- Includes a comment with the step text before each step execution. Do not duplicate comments if step requires multiple actions.
- Always use best practices from the log when generating tests.
### 1. Adding New Todos **Seed:** `tests/seed.spec.ts` #### 1.1 Add Valid Todo **Steps:** 1. Click in the "What needs to be done?" input field #### 1.2 Add Multiple Todos ...Following file is generated:
// spec: specs/plan.md // seed: tests/seed.spec.ts test.describe('Adding New Todos', () => { test('Add Valid Todo', async { page } => { // 1. Click in the "What needs to be done?" input field await page.click(...); ... }); });
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 151 tokens per session scan A d267d66831af
playwright-test-generator is an agent published in the GitHub repository moasq/agentic-ship (11 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 151 tokens to every session and 806 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to playwright-test-generator, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
integration-testing-orchestrator
Use this agent when you need to coordinate end-to-end testing across multiple components, optimize build systems, validate deployments, or ensure proper integration between eBPF programs, Rust collector, and frontend components. Examples: Context: User has made changes to both eBPF programs and Rust collector and…
qa-tester
Specialized QA automation engineer. Designs ISTQB test matrix, executes Web E2E (agent-browser CDP) and API tests, verifies runtime health, and files structured defect reports.
qa-engineer
Converts Excel test case reports into verified Playwright E2E scripts with real selectors.
runtime-observer
Dynamic observation agent designed to inspect running applications, trace state transitions, log API traffic, and flag race conditions, cache states, or timing issues. Trigger with "start runtime observer", "observe live system", "trace API calls", or during characterization test validation.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.
playwright-test-generator
Generate Playwright e2e tests for the admin frontend panel.