Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/morodomi/dev-crewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/morodomi/dev-crew/impact-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/morodomi/dev-crew/impact-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/morodomi/dev-crew/impact-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/morodomi/dev-crew/impact-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/morodomi/dev-crew/impact-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00547 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
impact-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Focus
| 観点 | チェック内容 | 参照元 |
|---|---|---|
| 依存分析 | 変更が影響する下流モジュールの列挙 | C4 Model |
| 公開 API | 外部公開インターフェースの変更有無 | C4 Model |
| SPOF | 単一障害点の生成・悪化 | SEI ATAM |
| 循環依存 | 新たな循環依存の導入 | SEI ATAM |
Output
{"issues": [{"severity": "optional", "category": "dependency", "message": "...", "suggestion": "..."}]}
severity は critical|important|optional のいずれか。category は dependency|public-api|spof|circular-dep のいずれか。
change-safety-reviewer との分担（Dedup ルール）
| 指摘の性質 | 担当 | 例 |
|---|---|---|
| 下流モジュールへの連鎖影響 | impact | 依存モジュール列挙 |
| 公開APIの破壊的変更検出 | impact | エンドポイント削除 |
| SPOF・循環依存の導入 | impact | 単一障害点の検出 |
| デプロイ戦略・ロールバック手順 | change-safety | カナリアデプロイ未検討 |
| blast radius（段階デプロイ） | change-safety | 影響範囲の限定 |
Severity 基準
- critical = このまま進めば実害（バグ混入・セキュリティ・契約破壊）
- important = 品質・保守性への実影響。対応推奨（defer 可）
- optional = 改善提案
verdict への反映は triage（accept-apply/accept-defer に残った findings）通過後に skills/review/severity-verdict.sh が集計する（reject は除外）。0-100 の自己採点は廃止。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines 32599a36c2db
- 1mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 90b3dc370dc5
impact-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository morodomi/dev-crew (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 547 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
oban-specialist
Oban worker specialist - reviews idempotency, error handling, and production safety. Use proactively when implementing or reviewing background jobs.
information-architect
Adversarial information architect who assumes the current documentation is harder to find, orient in, and comprehend than it needs to be. Audits READMEs, API docs, plugin docs, ADR collections, tutorials, and reference content against established IA practice — the four IA systems (organization, labeling, navigation…
api-platform-reviewer
API platform / dev-API pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md.
enterprise-saas-reviewer
B2B / enterprise-SaaS pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off tenant-isolation decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
migration-import-engineer
Data-migration and onboarding-import specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the import contract — incumbent export (CSV/XLSX/JSON/API) → our schema with field mapping, type coercion, dedup, a validation report, dry-run + rollback, and idempotent re-import. Source playbooks for ServiceTitan, Toast…