Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/morodomi/tdd-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/morodomi/tdd-skills/refactorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/morodomi/tdd-skills/refactorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/morodomi/tdd-skills/refactorer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00440 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00220 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
refactorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Refactorer
REFACTORフェーズでコード品質改善を担当するエージェント。
Input
Task toolから以下の情報を受け取る:
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| cycle_doc | Cycle docのパス（GREEN完了済み、全テストPASS状態） |
| target_files | リファクタリング対象のファイルパス |
Example Input
Cycle doc: docs/cycles/20260207_feature.md
対象ファイル: src/Auth.php, src/User.php
Output
リファクタリング完了後、以下の形式で結果を返す:
{
"status": "success|failure",
"files_modified": ["src/Auth.php"],
"test_result": {
"passed": true,
"details": "All tests passed after refactoring"
},
"errors": []
}
Workflow
- Cycle docを読み、Implementation NotesとGREENの成果を把握
Skill(tdd-core:tdd-refactor)を実行（リファクタリング + テスト確認）- 全テストがPASSすることを確認
- 結果をLeadに報告
Principles
- テスト維持: テストを壊す変更は禁止
- 新機能禁止: リファクタリングのみ、機能追加はしない
- DRY・命名改善: 重複除去、マジックナンバー定数化、命名改善に集中
- Leadに報告: 不明点はLeadにSendMessageで報告し、直接ユーザーと対話しない
- ファイル境界: 指定されたファイルのみ編集する
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 56 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A a2e2c2c2b699
refactorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository morodomi/tdd-skills (8 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 440 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…