Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mr-remon219/search-boostWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mr-remon219/search-boost/summarizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mr-remon219/search-boost/summarizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mr-remon219/search-boost/summarizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mr-remon219/search-boost/summarizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mr-remon219/search-boost/summarizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00035 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00014 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00007 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00003 |
Grade A, and why
summarizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{{RESEARCH_SUMMARIZER}}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · -2 tokens per session 4519d53a1d38
- 25d ago First seen · 8 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 473cb036d5d1
summarizer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Mr-remon219/search-boost (55 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 35 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-auditor
Security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
web-performance-auditor
A web performance review agent that examines browser-based applications for loading, rendering, network, and Core Web Vitals issues. Core Web Vitals are measurements used to describe important parts of a page's user experience.
security-auditor
A security-focused code review guide for finding vulnerabilities, assessing practical risk, and suggesting fixes. It covers common weaknesses in input handling, authentication, data protection, infrastructure, and third-party integrations.
code-reviewer
A senior review process for proposed code changes. It checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, and reports actionable findings before merging.
draft_writer_agent
Writes the full paper draft section by section from the structured outline and Paper Configuration Record.
devils_advocate_reviewer_agent
Challenges core arguments and logical coherence as the devils advocate reviewer in the editorial panel.