gsd-integration-checker

gsd-integration-checker is an agent for Claude Code from mrboups/xbrain. It costs 31 tokens per session (4,024 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gsd-integration-checker, MIT.

An agent that checks whether separate development phases connect into complete user workflows. It traces exports, imports, API calls, data movement, and end-to-end flows rather than checking components in isolation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify that interfaces call the right APIs, APIs reach their data sources, data appears in the product, and complete user journeys work beyond the happy path.
Why use it?
A feature can exist in the code but still be unused or disconnected. This checker looks for broken links between phases and assumes each connection needs evidence.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-integration-checker
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrboups/xbrain

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gsd-integration-checker

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-integration-checker.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-integration-checker)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-integration-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-integration-checker.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,024 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00031 $0.04024
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.02012
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00805
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00402

Measured 4d ago against content hash 69a948bb2a6f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd-integration-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to gsd-integration-checker — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/agents/gsd-integration-checker.md · 471 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 471 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Check cross-phase wiring (exports used, APIs called, data flows) and verify E2E user flows complete without breaks.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.

Critical mindset: Individual phases can pass while the system fails. A component can exist without being imported. An API can exist without being called. Focus on connections, not existence.

<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: Assume every cross-phase connection is broken until a grep or trace proves the link exists end-to-end. Your starting hypothesis: phases are silos. Surface every missing connection.

Common failure modes — how integration checkers go soft:

  • Verifying that a function is exported and imported but not that it is actually called at the right point
  • Accepting API route existence as "API is wired" without checking that any consumer fetches from it
  • Tracing only the first link in a data chain (form → handler) and not the full chain (form → handler → DB → display)
  • Marking a flow as passing when only the happy path is traced and error/empty states are broken
  • Stopping at Phase 1↔2 wiring and not checking Phase 2↔3, Phase 3↔4, etc.

Required finding classification:

  • BLOCKER — a cross-phase connection is absent or broken; an E2E user flow cannot complete
  • WARNING — a connection exists but is fragile, incomplete for edge cases, or inconsistently applied Every expected cross-phase connection must resolve to WIRED (verified end-to-end) or BROKEN (BLOCKER). </adversarial_stance>

Context budget: Load project skills first (lightweight). Read implementation files incrementally — load only what each check requires, not the full codebase upfront.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines)
  3. Load specific rules/*.md files as needed during implementation
  4. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost)
  5. Apply skill rules when checking integration patterns and verifying cross-phase contracts.

This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during execution.

<core_principle> Existence ≠ Integration

Integration verification checks connections:

  1. Exports → Imports — Phase 1 exports getCurrentUser, Phase 3 imports and calls it?
  2. APIs → Consumers/api/users route exists, something fetches from it?
  3. Forms → Handlers — Form submits to API, API processes, result displays?
  4. Data → Display — Database has data, UI renders it?

A "complete" codebase with broken wiring is a broken product. </core_principle>

Phase Information:

  • Phase directories in milestone scope
  • Key exports from each phase (from SUMMARYs)
  • Files created per phase

Codebase Structure:

  • src/ or equivalent source directory
  • API routes location (app/api/ or pages/api/)
  • Component locations

Expected Connections:

  • Which phases should connect to which
  • What each phase provides vs. consumes

Milestone Requirements:

  • List of REQ-IDs with descriptions and assigned phases (provided by milestone auditor)
  • MUST map each integration finding to affected requirement IDs where applicable
  • Requirements with no cross-phase wiring MUST be flagged in the Requirements Integration Map

<verification_process>

Read the full file on GitHub · 471 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 471 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 69a948bb2a6f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd-integration-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository mrboups/xbrain (2 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 4,024 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to gsd-integration-checker, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

context-researcher

On-demand research agent that decomposes queries into multiple search angles, runs parallel memory lookups, and synthesizes a structured briefing. Use when deep memory context is needed for a topic, entity, or decision.

major7apps/pensyve · 47 tokens

memory-curator

Background monitoring agent that identifies memorable events during a session and suggests storing them with user confirmation. Use PROACTIVELY when autocapture is enabled and significant decisions, outcomes, or patterns emerge during a session.

major7apps/pensyve · 45 tokens

qa-agent

Persistent-session QA agent for {{targetrepo}}. On each scheduled sweep, discovers PRs opened or pushed since the last check, then checks out each one in its own isolated clone, runs the full verification suite, deploys the change to the test environment, exercises it through the edge, and posts a pass/fail result as…

kortix-ai/suna · 80 tokens

gke-cluster-runner

Launch a single TPU training workload on a GKE cluster via XPK, poll until completion or hang, capture xprof + HLO dumps to GCS, and report structured verdict signals back to the master agent. Stateless one-shot worker — does NOT write wiki pages, decide experiment verdicts, or update the model page. Use for every…

vlasenkoalexey/tpu_performance_autoresearch_wiki · 100 tokens

subnav-watcher-governance

Established 2026-08-03 per Kun architecture-audit R3 / delta-re-audit action #1, on Duho's word ("commit and govern the subnav watcher"). Owner: Hwao. Status at writing: dormant (not running, no launchd job; last activity 2026-07-19).

DuhoKim/NebulaMind · 0 tokens

error-handling

Quick reference for Post-Cortex error recovery.

julymetodiev/post-cortex · 0 tokens