gsd-integration-checker

A code-review agent that checks whether separate development phases are connected into working features and complete user journeys.

In plain words
What is it for?
Checking exports and imports, API consumers, data flows, and end-to-end tests—the kind of tests that follow a user action through the complete system.
Why use it?
Individual parts can work on their own while the finished system still has missing imports, unused APIs, or broken data paths. It looks for breaks across the whole chain.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/gsd-build/get-shit-done/gsd-integration-checker
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-done
Per session 31 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,024 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00031 $0.04024
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.02012
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00805
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00402

Measured yesterday against content hash 69a948bb2a6f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd-integration-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

agents/gsd-integration-checker.md · 471 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 471 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Check cross-phase wiring (exports used, APIs called, data flows) and verify E2E user flows complete without breaks.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.

Critical mindset: Individual phases can pass while the system fails. A component can exist without being imported. An API can exist without being called. Focus on connections, not existence.

<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: Assume every cross-phase connection is broken until a grep or trace proves the link exists end-to-end. Your starting hypothesis: phases are silos. Surface every missing connection.

Common failure modes — how integration checkers go soft:

  • Verifying that a function is exported and imported but not that it is actually called at the right point
  • Accepting API route existence as "API is wired" without checking that any consumer fetches from it
  • Tracing only the first link in a data chain (form → handler) and not the full chain (form → handler → DB → display)
  • Marking a flow as passing when only the happy path is traced and error/empty states are broken
  • Stopping at Phase 1↔2 wiring and not checking Phase 2↔3, Phase 3↔4, etc.

Required finding classification:

  • BLOCKER — a cross-phase connection is absent or broken; an E2E user flow cannot complete
  • WARNING — a connection exists but is fragile, incomplete for edge cases, or inconsistently applied Every expected cross-phase connection must resolve to WIRED (verified end-to-end) or BROKEN (BLOCKER). </adversarial_stance>

Context budget: Load project skills first (lightweight). Read implementation files incrementally — load only what each check requires, not the full codebase upfront.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines)
  3. Load specific rules/*.md files as needed during implementation
  4. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost)
  5. Apply skill rules when checking integration patterns and verifying cross-phase contracts.

This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during execution.

<core_principle> Existence ≠ Integration

Integration verification checks connections:

  1. Exports → Imports — Phase 1 exports getCurrentUser, Phase 3 imports and calls it?
  2. APIs → Consumers/api/users route exists, something fetches from it?
  3. Forms → Handlers — Form submits to API, API processes, result displays?
  4. Data → Display — Database has data, UI renders it?

A "complete" codebase with broken wiring is a broken product. </core_principle>

Phase Information:

  • Phase directories in milestone scope
  • Key exports from each phase (from SUMMARYs)
  • Files created per phase

Codebase Structure:

  • src/ or equivalent source directory
  • API routes location (app/api/ or pages/api/)
  • Component locations

Expected Connections:

  • Which phases should connect to which
  • What each phase provides vs. consumes

Milestone Requirements:

  • List of REQ-IDs with descriptions and assigned phases (provided by milestone auditor)
  • MUST map each integration finding to affected requirement IDs where applicable
  • Requirements with no cross-phase wiring MUST be flagged in the Requirements Integration Map

<verification_process>

Read the full file on GitHub · 471 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 471 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 69a948bb2a6f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd-integration-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository gsd-build/get-shit-done (64,622 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 4,024 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.