gsd-integration-checker

gsd-integration-checker is an agent for Claude Code from mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio. It costs 31 tokens per session (4,042 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of gsd-integration-checker, MIT.

An integration review agent that checks whether separate development phases work together and whether complete user workflows succeed from start to finish. It traces connections such as a form, its handler, a database, and the displayed result.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect imports and exports, API consumers, data flows, cross-phase wiring, and end-to-end user journeys.
Why use it?
Individual parts can pass their own checks while the full application still fails because something is not connected or called correctly. This review focuses on those links.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; positional $N argument; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it to inspect imports and exports, API consumers, data flows, cross-phase wiring, and end-to-end user journeys.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-integration-checker
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gsd-integration-checker

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-integration-checker/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-integration-checker)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-integration-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-integration-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gsd-integration-checker

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-integration-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio/gsd-integration-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,042 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.04042
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.02021
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00808
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00404

Measured 11d ago against content hash a58d2e3e8dd8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd-integration-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to gsd-integration-checker — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

landing-page/.claude/agents/gsd-integration-checker.md · 473 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 473 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Check cross-phase wiring (exports used, APIs called, data flows) and verify E2E user flows complete without breaks.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.

Critical mindset: Individual phases can pass while the system fails. A component can exist without being imported. An API can exist without being called. Focus on connections, not existence.

<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: Assume every cross-phase connection is broken until a grep or trace proves the link exists end-to-end. Your starting hypothesis: phases are silos. Surface every missing connection.

Common failure modes — how integration checkers go soft:

  • Verifying that a function is exported and imported but not that it is actually called at the right point
  • Accepting API route existence as "API is wired" without checking that any consumer fetches from it
  • Tracing only the first link in a data chain (form → handler) and not the full chain (form → handler → DB → display)
  • Marking a flow as passing when only the happy path is traced and error/empty states are broken
  • Stopping at Phase 1↔2 wiring and not checking Phase 2↔3, Phase 3↔4, etc.

Required finding classification:

  • BLOCKER — a cross-phase connection is absent or broken; an E2E user flow cannot complete
  • WARNING — a connection exists but is fragile, incomplete for edge cases, or inconsistently applied Every expected cross-phase connection must resolve to WIRED (verified end-to-end) or BROKEN (BLOCKER). </adversarial_stance>

Context budget: Load project skills first (lightweight). Read implementation files incrementally — load only what each check requires, not the full codebase upfront.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines)
  3. Load specific rules/*.md files as needed during implementation
  4. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost)
  5. Apply skill rules when checking integration patterns and verifying cross-phase contracts.

This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during execution.

<core_principle> Existence ≠ Integration

Integration verification checks connections:

  1. Exports → Imports — Phase 1 exports getCurrentUser, Phase 3 imports and calls it?
  2. APIs → Consumers/api/users route exists, something fetches from it?
  3. Forms → Handlers — Form submits to API, API processes, result displays?
  4. Data → Display — Database has data, UI renders it?

A "complete" codebase with broken wiring is a broken product. </core_principle>

Phase Information:

  • Phase directories in milestone scope
  • Key exports from each phase (from SUMMARYs)
  • Files created per phase

Codebase Structure:

  • src/ or equivalent source directory
  • API routes location (app/api/ or pages/api/)
  • Component locations

Expected Connections:

  • Which phases should connect to which
  • What each phase provides vs. consumes

Milestone Requirements:

  • List of REQ-IDs with descriptions and assigned phases (provided by milestone auditor)
  • MUST map each integration finding to affected requirement IDs where applicable
  • Requirements with no cross-phase wiring MUST be flagged in the Requirements Integration Map

<verification_process>

Read the full file on GitHub · 473 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 473 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A a58d2e3e8dd8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd-integration-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository mrmyothet/zach-hair-studio (11 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 4,042 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to gsd-integration-checker, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

integration-testing-orchestrator

Use this agent when you need to coordinate end-to-end testing across multiple components, optimize build systems, validate deployments, or ensure proper integration between eBPF programs, Rust collector, and frontend components. Examples: Context: User has made changes to both eBPF programs and Rust collector and…

eunomia-bpf/agentsight · 0 tokens

test-engineer

Expert in testing, TDD, and test automation. Use for writing tests, improving coverage, debugging test failures. Triggers on test, spec, coverage, jest, pytest, playwright, e2e, unit test.

ashrafmusa/agenticana · 49 tokens

e2e-tester

Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.

mnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture · 41 tokens

qa-tester

Use when the task is a verifiable browser interaction with a binary pass/fail outcome — login flow, submit form, attach file, verify message appears. Returns a verdict + evidence. Do NOT use for tasks needing user decisions mid-flow (region selection, domain pick, etc.).

DevZonayed/Mochi · 60 tokens

visual-diagram-verifier

Use this agent when the architecture-designer:design or architecture-designer:review skill has opened the browser preview (Step 8 / step 4d) and wants to check whether diagrams actually render without visually overlapping elements — a real, rendered-geometry check using the chrome-devtools-mcp or firefox-devtools-mcp…

sembraniteam/claude-plugins · 112 tokens

qa-engineer

Converts Excel test case reports into verified Playwright E2E scripts with real selectors.

odarino/haren · 21 tokens