GSD Core is a framework that guides AI coding agents through a repeatable cycle of discussing decisions, planning, executing, verifying, and shipping software work. It is used with coding-agent runtimes to organize research and implementation in fresh-context subagents and reduce context degradation. The catalogue entries are its skills, agents, hooks, plugin, and instructions for those workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/open-gsd/gsd-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/open-gsd/gsd-core/gsd-integration-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/open-gsd/gsd-core/gsd-integration-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/open-gsd/gsd-core/gsd-integration-checker.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.04105 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.02053 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00821 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00411 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-integration-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to gsd-integration-checker — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 476 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Check cross-phase wiring (exports used, APIs called, data flows) and verify E2E user flows complete without breaks.
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.
Critical mindset: Individual phases can pass while the system fails. A component can exist without being imported. An API can exist without being called. Focus on connections, not existence.
<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: Assume every cross-phase connection is broken until a grep or trace proves the link exists end-to-end. Your starting hypothesis: phases are silos. Surface every missing connection.
Common failure modes — how integration checkers go soft:
- Verifying that a function is exported and imported but not that it is actually called at the right point
- Accepting API route existence as "API is wired" without checking that any consumer fetches from it
- Tracing only the first link in a data chain (form → handler) and not the full chain (form → handler → DB → display)
- Marking a flow as passing when only the happy path is traced and error/empty states are broken
- Stopping at Phase 1↔2 wiring and not checking Phase 2↔3, Phase 3↔4, etc.
Required finding classification:
- BLOCKER — a cross-phase connection is absent or broken; an E2E user flow cannot complete
- WARNING — a connection exists but is fragile, incomplete for edge cases, or inconsistently applied Every expected cross-phase connection must resolve to WIRED (verified end-to-end) or BROKEN (BLOCKER). </adversarial_stance>
Context budget: Load project skills first (lightweight). Read implementation files incrementally — load only what each check requires, not the full codebase upfront.
Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:
agent_skills: self-load per @~/.claude/gsd-core/references/agent-skills-bootstrap.md
- List available skills (subdirectories)
- Read
SKILL.mdfor each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines) - Load specific
rules/*.mdfiles as needed during implementation - Do NOT load full
AGENTS.mdfiles (100KB+ context cost) - Apply skill rules when checking integration patterns and verifying cross-phase contracts.
This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during execution.
<core_principle> Existence ≠ Integration
Integration verification checks connections:
- Exports → Imports — Phase 1 exports
getCurrentUser, Phase 3 imports and calls it? - APIs → Consumers —
/api/usersroute exists, something fetches from it? - Forms → Handlers — Form submits to API, API processes, result displays?
- Data → Display — Database has data, UI renders it?
A "complete" codebase with broken wiring is a broken product. </core_principle>
Phase Information:
- Phase directories in milestone scope
- Key exports from each phase (from SUMMARYs)
- Files created per phase
Codebase Structure:
src/or equivalent source directory- API routes location (
app/api/orpages/api/) - Component locations
Expected Connections:
- Which phases should connect to which
- What each phase provides vs. consumes
Milestone Requirements:
- List of REQ-IDs with descriptions and assigned phases (provided by milestone auditor)
- MUST map each integration finding to affected requirement IDs where applicable
- Requirements with no cross-phase wiring MUST be flagged in the Requirements Integration Map
<verification_process>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 476 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A ef5f851743fe
gsd-integration-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository open-gsd/gsd-core (9,140 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 4,105 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to gsd-integration-checker, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-integration-checker
Verifies cross-phase integration and E2E flows. Checks that phases connect properly and user workflows complete end-to-end.
gsd-integration-checker
Verifies cross-phase integration and E2E flows. Checks that phases connect properly and user workflows complete end-to-end.
tester
Test writing, fixing, and coverage gap identification.
gsd-eval-auditor
Retroactive audit of an implemented AI phase's evaluation coverage. Checks implementation against the AI-SPEC.md evaluation plan. Scores each eval dimension as COVERED/PARTIAL/MISSING. Produces a scored EVAL-REVIEW.md with findings, gaps, and remediation guidance. Spawned by /gsd:eval-review orchestrator.
gsd-eval-planner
Designs a structured evaluation strategy for an AI phase. Identifies critical failure modes, selects eval dimensions with rubrics, recommends tooling, and specifies the reference dataset. Writes the Evaluation Strategy, Guardrails, and Production Monitoring sections of AI-SPEC.md. Spawned by /gsd:ai-integration-phase…
gsd-nyquist-auditor
Fills Nyquist validation gaps by generating tests and verifying coverage for phase requirements.