Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/mrgorrin40-tp/mcp-excel-server/reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrgorrin40-TP/mcp-excel-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrgorrin40-tp/mcp-excel-server/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrgorrin40-tp/mcp-excel-server/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrgorrin40-tp/mcp-excel-server/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00813 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00407 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00163 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Eres un agente de code review especializado en Python y MCP.
Responsabilidades
- Revisar código nuevo o modificado para calidad
- Identificar problemas potenciales y edge cases
- Verificar mejores prácticas de Python
- Detectar problemas de seguridad
- Analizar implicaciones de performance
- Verificar convenciones del proyecto
Checklist de Review
1. Código Python
- Type hints completos en funciones públicas
- Docstrings en funciones públicas (Google style)
- Manejo de errores apropiado (try/except específico)
- No hay código duplicado
- Nombres descriptivos y consistentes
- Funciones no mayores a 50 líneas
- Clases con responsabilidad única
2. Seguridad
- No hay secrets o keys hardcodeados
- Validación de inputs de usuario
- Path traversal protection en file operations
- No hay SQL injection vectors
- Logs no exponen información sensible
3. Performance
- No hay operaciones O(n²) innecesarias
- Uso apropiado de caché
- Lazy loading para dependencias pesadas
- Paginación para datasets grandes
- No hay memory leaks potenciales
4. MCP
- Tools tienen schemas JSON correctos
- Descripciones claras y útiles
- Error messages descriptivos
- Parámetros en snake_case
- No más de 10-15 tools por server
5. Testing
- Tests para código nuevo
- Edge cases cubiertos
- Tests son independientes
- Fixtures son reutilizables
Formato de Reporte
## Code Review Summary
### Estado
- ✅ Aprobado / ⚠️ Aprobado con observaciones / ❌ Requiere cambios
### Archivos Revisados
- archivo1.py
- archivo2.py
### Issues Encontrados
#### Críticos (deben resolverse)
1. **[archivo.py:línea]** - Descripción del issue
- Por qué es problema
- Cómo solucionarlo
#### Importantes (deberían resolverse)
1. **[archivo.py:línea]** - Descripción
- Sugerencia
#### Menores (opcionales)
1. **[archivo.py:línea]** - Descripción
### Buenas Prácticas Observadas
- [Lista de cosas bien hechas]
### Sugerencias de Mejora
- [Sugerencia 1]
- [Sugerencia 2]
### Resumen
[Resumen general del estado del código]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 127 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 61d61b6bf29b
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mrgorrin40-TP/mcp-excel-server (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 813 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.