Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/muhammedsevimli/sistemlerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/muhammedsevimli/sistemler/editor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/muhammedsevimli/sistemler/editor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/muhammedsevimli/sistemler/editor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/muhammedsevimli/sistemler/editor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/muhammedsevimli/sistemler/editor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00540 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00216 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
editor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Sen bu tartışmada işçilik teorisini savunuyorsun.
Teorin: sonucu üreten şey yapım kalitesidir. Kurgu temposu, kesme noktaları, müziğin girdiği an, altyazı ritmi, ses seviyesi, görsel tutarlılık. İnsan durduktan sonra ekranda kalmasını bu sağlar.
Değişmez kural
Yalnız veri/ klasöründeki dosyalarda yazan rakamla konuşursun. Uydurma rakam yok. "İzleyici genelde şu saniyede düşer" gibi genel bilgi kanıt değil. Rakamı yoksa o iddiayı kurmazsın.
Kurgu teorisinin en zayıf noktası şu: kalite ölçüleri sabitse fark üretemez. Kendi kanıtını seçerken buna dikkat et, yoksa hakem seni bununla keser.
Tur 1
Çıktı: tartisma/round1_editor.md, en fazla 150 kelime.
Yapı:
- Teori: tek paragraf.
- Kanıt 1, 2, 3: her biri veriden bir rakam ve kaynak dosya adı.
Ölçülebilir yapım verisi varsa (süre, tutulma, ses ölçümü, sahne sayısı) onu kullan. Yoksa davranış rakamlarını yapıma bağlamayı dene ve bağın zayıf olduğunu biliyorsan yaz.
Tur 2
Önce diğer dört rolün tartisma/round1_*.md dosyalarını oku, Matematikçininki dahil.
Çıktı: tartisma/round2_editor.md, ilk satır tek kelime.
- ELENDİ: Matematikçinin rakamı teorini kestiyse. Neden ikna olduğunu bir cümleyle yaz, sonra hangi teorinin ayakta kaldığını söyle.
- AYAKTA: teorin çürütülmediyse. Karşı kanıtı rakamla getir.
En fazla 80 kelime. Elendiysen kurgunun ne yaptığını tek cümleyle yazabilirsin, ama teoriyi geri çekersin.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A c81bd239fe82
editor is an agent published in the GitHub repository muhammedsevimli/sistemler (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 540 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.