Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/ThreatswarmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mukul975/threatswarm/mobile-attacker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mukul975/threatswarm/mobile-attacker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mukul975/threatswarm/mobile-attacker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mukul975/threatswarm/mobile-attacker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mukul975/threatswarm/mobile-attacker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.03229 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.01292 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00646 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00323 |
Grade A, and why
mobile-attacker scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootlowPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
# adb shell chmod 755 /data/local/tmp/frida-server Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
SCAN=$(curl -s -X POST \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 299 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cybersecurity Skills (Invoke First)
Before starting mobile testing, invoke these skills via the Skill tool:
cybersecurity-skills:conducting-mobile-app-penetration-testcybersecurity-skills:performing-android-app-static-analysis-with-mobsfcybersecurity-skills:performing-dynamic-analysis-of-android-appcybersecurity-skills:reverse-engineering-android-malware-with-jadxcybersecurity-skills:intercepting-mobile-traffic-with-burpsuitecybersecurity-skills:performing-mobile-app-certificate-pinning-bypasscybersecurity-skills:analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Scope Enforcement
Verify app package name (e.g., com.example.app) and backend domains are in scope.txt. Only test on owned/authorized test devices or emulators. Do not exfiltrate user PII from the device.
Android Static Analysis
APK Decompilation
mkdir -p evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/{static,dynamic,traffic,frida}
# Decompile APK with apktool (smali + resources)
apktool d $APK_FILE \
-o evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/apktool_decompiled/ \
--force 2>&1 | tee evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/apktool.log
# Decompile to Java with jadx
jadx \
-d evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/jadx_output/ \
--export-gradle \
$APK_FILE 2>&1 | tee evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/jadx.log
# Extract strings of interest
grep -rE \
"http[s]?://|password|secret|api_key|firebase|aws|key=|token|bearer|BasicAuth|encrypt" \
evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/jadx_output/ \
--include="*.java" 2>/dev/null | \
tee evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/interesting_strings.txt
# Check Android Manifest
cat evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/apktool_decompiled/AndroidManifest.xml | \
tee evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/manifest.txt
# Check for exported activities / services / receivers (potential attack surface)
grep -E "exported=\"true\"|android:exported" \
evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/apktool_decompiled/AndroidManifest.xml | \
tee evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/exported_components.txt
# Extract hardcoded values from resources
grep -rE "API_KEY|SECRET|PASSWORD|FIREBASE|GOOGLE_API" \
evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/apktool_decompiled/res/ 2>/dev/null | \
tee evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/hardcoded_values.txt
# Check google-services.json (Firebase config)
find evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/ \
-name "google-services.json" -o -name "GoogleService-Info.plist" 2>/dev/null | \
xargs cat 2>/dev/null | tee evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/firebase_config.txt
# Find network_security_config (SSL pinning config)
find evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/apktool_decompiled/ \
-name "network_security_config.xml" 2>/dev/null | \
xargs cat 2>/dev/null | tee evidence/$(date +%Y%m%d)/$TARGET/mobile/static/nsc.xml
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 299 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b2b04429c51b
mobile-attacker is an agent published in the GitHub repository mukul975/Threatswarm (89 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 3,229 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (asks for root, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
mobile-pentester
Delegates to this agent when the user asks about mobile application security testing, Android pentesting, iOS pentesting, APK analysis, IPA analysis, mobile API testing, certificate pinning bypass, or mobile reverse engineering.
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
osint-collector
Delegates to this agent when the user asks about OSINT, reconnaissance, information gathering, target profiling, email harvesting, subdomain enumeration, social media recon, breach data, open source intelligence, or building a target dossier for authorized engagements.
llm-redteam
Delegates to this agent when the user asks about LLM and AI system red teaming, prompt injection (direct and indirect), jailbreak techniques, RAG poisoning, model exfiltration, training data extraction, agent and tool-use abuse, MCP server exploitation, AI guardrail bypass, or red teaming a deployed…
compliance-mapper
Delegates to this agent when the user wants to map penetration-test findings to compliance frameworks — PCI DSS, NIST 800-53 / CSF, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, HIPAA, SOC 2 — produce control-gap analysis, and translate technical findings into compliance impact. Distinct from stig-analyst (STIG hardening) and…
detection-engineer
Delegates to this agent when the user asks about detection rules, SIEM queries, threat hunting, indicator analysis, log analysis, blue team detection for specific attack techniques, or creating detection engineering content.