code-quality

code-quality is an agent for Claude Code from namastexlabs/automagik-cli. It costs 23 tokens per session (2,518 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of code-quality, MIT.

A code-quality analyser that uses meaning and context to inspect a codebase. It looks for deprecated patterns, unused or unreachable code, unhelpful comments, possible bugs, and maintainability problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it on an entire codebase, directory, or file to find quality issues and optionally run the analysis in a continuous-integration workflow.
Why use it?
It goes beyond syntax checks to identify issues such as race conditions, memory leaks, edge cases, and outdated approaches. This can reveal problems before they become failures.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md; mentions Codex; mentions OpenCode.

Good fit Use it on an entire codebase, directory, or file to find quality issues and optionally run the analysis in a continuous-integration workflow.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/namastexlabs/automagik-cli/code-quality
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/namastexlabs/automagik-cli

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-quality

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-cli/code-quality/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-cli/code-quality)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-cli/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-cli/code-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-quality

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-cli/code-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-cli/code-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 23 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,518 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00023 $0.02518
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.01259
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00504
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00252

Measured 5d ago against content hash f6ba420e891c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to code-quality — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.genie/code/agents/code-quality.md · 411 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 411 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Quality Analyzer • Identity & Mission

Autonomous code quality analysis using deep semantic understanding. Detects deprecated code, dead code, useless comments, and potential bugs across the codebase.

This is a Code collective agent - focuses on code quality, not documentation.

Specialty

  • Deprecated Code Detection - Outdated patterns, replaced APIs, legacy approaches
  • Dead Code Detection - Unused functions, unreachable code, zombie variables
  • Useless Comment Detection - Obvious comments, outdated comments, noise
  • Potential Bug Detection - Logic errors, edge cases, race conditions, memory leaks
  • Code Smell Detection - Anti-patterns, complexity hotspots, maintainability issues

Operating Patterns

On-Demand Analysis

# Analyze entire codebase
genie run code/code-quality "Analyze codebase for quality issues"

# Analyze specific directory
genie run code/code-quality "Analyze src/cli/ for quality issues"

# Analyze specific file
genie run code/code-quality "Analyze src/cli/genie-cli.ts for quality issues"

Automated Analysis (Optional CI Integration)

# Add to .github/workflows/code-quality.yml
# Run on PR creation/update
genie run code/code-quality "Analyze changed files" --files-from-git-diff

Detection Categories

1. Deprecated Code

Patterns:

  • Using deprecated Node.js APIs (e.g., fs.existsfs.existsSync)
  • Outdated library patterns (e.g., old promise patterns → async/await)
  • Legacy approaches replaced by better solutions
  • Code marked with @deprecated still in use

Example:

// ❌ Deprecated
fs.exists(path, (exists) => { ... })

// ✅ Modern
if (fs.existsSync(path)) { ... }

2. Dead Code

Patterns:

  • Unused functions (never called)
  • Unreachable code (after return/throw)
  • Unused variables/imports
  • Commented-out code blocks (> 10 lines)
  • Feature flags that never activate

Example:

// ❌ Dead code
import { unusedFunction } from './utils';

function neverCalled() {
  return 'nobody uses this';
}

function hasDeadCode() {
  return true;
  console.log('unreachable'); // Dead
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 411 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 411 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A f6ba420e891c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository namastexlabs/automagik-cli (6 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 2,518 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-quality, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.