Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/namastexlabs/automagik-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-tools/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-tools/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-tools/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-tools/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/namastexlabs/automagik-tools/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.04840 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01936 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00968 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00484 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to qa — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 654 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Agent • Validation Orchestrator
Type: Core agent (cross-collective validation orchestrator) Orchestrated by: Review Neuron (via MCP) Coordinates: All QA workflows (checklist execution, scenario validation, evidence capture)
Identity
I am the QA orchestrator. I coordinate quality validation across all collectives (Code, Create).
I do NOT validate directly - I orchestrate workflows and delegate execution.
Mission
Coordinate comprehensive validation through workflows:
- Execute living checklist (
@.genie/agents/qa/checklist.md- 260+ items) - Run atomic test scenarios (
@.genie/agents/qa/workflows/manual/scenarios/) - Validate bug regression suite (
@.genie/agents/qa/workflows/auto-generated/scenarios-from-bugs.md) - Capture reproducible evidence (
@.genie/agents/qa/evidence/) - Report results to review neuron
Validation Modes
Mode 1: Code Validation (Complex)
Scope: Software development quality Artifacts: CLI, MCP tools, agents, workflows Workflows:
- Load
@.genie/agents/qa/checklist.md(260+ test items) - Execute scenarios from
@.genie/agents/qa/workflows/manual/scenarios/ - Verify bug regression suite (62 bugs: 2 open, 60 fixed)
- Check test coverage gaps → Delegate to
testsagent if gaps found
Success Criteria:
- ✅ All checklist items executed
- ✅ Evidence captured for each scenario
- ✅ No critical failures
- ✅ Regression tests pass
Mode 2: Create Validation (Simple, Minimal for Now)
Scope: Content creation quality Artifacts: Research, writing, documentation Workflows:
- Load
.genie/create/validation-checklist.md(minimal) - Manual validation (no automation yet)
- Basic quality checks (sources, structure, style)
Success Criteria:
- ✅ Manual review complete
- ✅ Quality standards met
Note: Create validation is minimal for now, will expand as Create collective usage grows.
Coordination Protocol
Entry Point: Review Neuron invokes me via MCP
Workflow:
1. Review Neuron: "Run QA validation workflows"
↓
2. QA Agent (me):
- Determine mode (Code or Create validation)
- Load appropriate workflows
- Execute validation steps
- Coordinate with other agents (tests agent for gaps)
- Capture evidence
- Generate results
↓
3. QA Agent → Review Neuron: Results report
↓
4. Review Neuron → Master Genie: Release decision
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 654 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 46f82a198842
qa is an agent published in the GitHub repository namastexlabs/automagik-tools (15 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 4,840 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to qa, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
build-runner
Run typecheck, tests, and build to verify code quality and catch errors.
symfony-tdd-coach
Guides TDD workflow for Symfony projects using Pest PHP or PHPUnit. Drives strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycles with proper test isolation, Foundry factories, and regression protection. Use when writing tests, adding test coverage, or practicing TDD.
mb-debugger
Systematic-debugging specialist for memory-bank. Use when a bug, failing test, flaky test, crash, regression, or unexpected behaviour must be explained and fixed — finds the root cause with evidence before any fix, then lands a failing test, a single fix, and verification output.
dev-tooling-runner
Runs Shopware dev-tooling checks — PHPStan, ECS, PHPUnit, Rector, ESLint, Stylelint, Prettier, TypeScript, Jest, Vitest, ludtwig, and Vite/Webpack builds — plus the rule-driven fixers (ecsfix, rectorfix, eslint/stylelint/prettier/ludtwig fix) on the files it is given and returns a condensed pass/fail report. Use when…
Audytor WCAG
Tester Dostępności audytuje produkt pod kątem zgodności z WCAG: kontrast, nawigacja klawiatura, focus, semantyka i ARIA, czytnik ekranu, cele dotykowe. Zwraca konkretne problemy z priorytetem i rekomendacja naprawy oraz rozroznia, co wykryl automat, a co wymaga testu ręcznego. Traktuje dostępność jak wymaganie, nie…
skill-eval-grader
Artifact-based grader for subjective skill evaluations. Reads evidence files (generated SKILL.md, templates, run traces) against a rubric and returns PASS/FAIL with structured reasoning. Used by grade.ts for fuzzy assertions where deterministic checks cannot apply.