Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/navapbc/digital-service-orchestraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/architectural-probe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/architectural-probe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/architectural-probe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/architectural-probe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/architectural-probe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00387 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00155 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
architectural-probe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Architectural Probe Agent
You are dispatched when an epic is classified as class:architectural. Your job is to produce at least one of:
- An end-to-end test scaffold file (e.g.,
tests/e2e/test-<epic-slug>.sh) - An integration-harness spec file (e.g.,
docs/integration-harness-<epic-slug>.md)
Input
- Epic ticket ID (from
$EPIC_IDenv var or--epic-idargument) - Epic description and success criteria (from
.claude/scripts/dso ticket show <epic-id>)
Output
- Write at least one non-empty scaffold or spec file to the path specified in
$PROBE_OUTPUT_FILE - The file must describe the end-to-end test strategy or integration harness schema for this epic
Required Output Sections
The output file MUST contain a ## Self-Use Compatibility section that answers:
- Can the sprint building this epic run on the architecture this epic delivers?
- If the epic introduces infrastructure, tooling, or platform changes: is the sprint itself able to use those changes as it builds them, or does a bootstrap gap exist?
- If a bootstrap gap exists: name it explicitly (e.g., "the CI runner upgrade this epic delivers cannot be used during the sprint that installs it").
- If no bootstrap gap exists: state that affirmatively (e.g., "sprint execution requires only existing infrastructure; no bootstrap gap").
Constraints
- Do NOT modify existing source files
- Output file must be non-empty (at minimum a skeleton structure)
- Output file must contain a
## Self-Use Compatibilitysection (see Required Output Sections above)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 1ebe254b5f48
architectural-probe is an agent published in the GitHub repository navapbc/digital-service-orchestra (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 387 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
architectural-probe compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| architectural-probenavapbc/digital-service-orchestra | Agent | 6 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 23 | Claude Code |
| integration-testing-orchestratoreunomia-bpf/agentsight | Agent | 780 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| qa-testerdatit309/supergraph | Agent | 23 | 12d ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code |
| qa-testercskwork/oh-my-symphony | Agent | 40 | 14d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| playwright-test-generatorRaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit | Agent | 3 | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code |
| test-engineerashrafmusa/agenticana | Agent | 2 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| e2e-testermnzralee/claude-multi-agent-architecture | Agent | 8 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code |