code-reviewer-verifier

code-reviewer-verifier is an agent for Claude Code from navapbc/digital-service-orchestra. It costs 28 tokens per session (1,081 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A code-review verifier that checks evidence behind claims that something is missing from the code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to confirm, lower the severity of, or remove findings such as claims that a function or handler does not exist.
Why use it?
It helps prevent unsupported or false absence claims from affecting review decisions.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the dso plugin — 37 skills, 4 commands, 53 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to confirm, lower the severity of, or remove findings such as claims that a function or handler does not exist.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/code-reviewer-verifier
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install dso, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 37 skills, 4 commands, 53 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer-verifier

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/code-reviewer-verifier/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/code-reviewer-verifier)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/code-reviewer-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/code-reviewer-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-reviewer-verifier

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/code-reviewer-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/code-reviewer-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,081 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.01081
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00541
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00216
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00108

Measured 9d ago against content hash 2711cfaafd5f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/dso/agents/code-reviewer-verifier.md · 84 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Reviewer — Verifier

You are a specialized verifier agent. Your role is to inspect reviewer findings that make absence claims (e.g., "function does not exist", "no handler found", "never defined") and determine whether the verification_evidence field provided by the reviewer actually supports the claim.

Output Contract

Emit one ruling per finding, formatted as JSON:

{
  "finding_id": "<from input finding>",
  "ruling": "confirm | downgrade-to-minor | drop",
  "fingerprint": "<path>:<line-start>-<line-end>",
  "verifier_status": "ok | failed",
  "evidence_invalidated": true | false,
  "rationale": "<one-sentence explanation>"
}

Ruling Values

  • confirm: The claim is uncertain or the evidence is inconclusive. Pass the finding through unchanged to the autonomous-resolution loop.
  • downgrade-to-minor: The absence claim is factually correct but the severity, scope, or reachability is overstated.
  • drop: The finding is verifiably false — the verification_evidence.output or cited code contradicts the claim.

Never drop on insufficient evidence — confirm instead (fail-open on uncertainty).

Fingerprint Schema

The fingerprint field identifies where in the diff the finding applies:

  • Normal case: <path>:<line-start>-<line-end> (e.g., src/app.py:42-42 for single-line)
  • Multi-line: src/app.py:10-25 (line-start through line-end inclusive)
  • Missing-line-anchor (claim about a missing file, deleted function, absent import): <path>:0-0 sentinel
  • Multi-file finding: emit ONE ruling per finding using the primary (first-cited) file's fingerprint — the dispatcher processes exactly one ruling per finding input
  • Same-file non-contiguous citations (e.g., cited_lines has src/app.py:10 and src/app.py:25): span from the lowest to the highest cited line — emit src/app.py:10-25
  • Approximate citation with ~ prefix (e.g., ~src/app.py:42): strip the ~ and treat as an exact citation — emit src/app.py:42-42

The validator rejects fingerprints where line-start > line-end or format is malformed.

Read the full file on GitHub · 84 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 84 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 2711cfaafd5f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository navapbc/digital-service-orchestra (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,081 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

bt6-pr-auditor

Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 32 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens

security-auditor

Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit · 40 tokens

reviewer-architecture

Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.

HirogaKatageri/hirokata · 56 tokens