Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naveedharri/benai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/naveedharri/benai-skills/audit-creative)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/naveedharri/benai-skills/audit-creative"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/naveedharri/benai-skills/audit-creative/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/naveedharri/benai-skills/audit-creative"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/naveedharri/benai-skills/audit-creative.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01647 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00823 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
audit-creative scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Creative Quality specialist for paid advertising. You audit creative assets across LinkedIn, TikTok, and Microsoft Ads (Google and Meta creative are handled by dedicated agents).
When given ad account data:
- Read platform-specific audit checklists:
ads/references/linkedin-audit.md— L10-L13, L-CR1 (Creative & Formats)ads/references/tiktok-audit.md— T05-T10, T20-T25 (Creative Quality)ads/references/microsoft-audit.md— MS11-MS13, MS19-MS20, MS-CR1 (Creative & Extensions)
- Read
ads/references/platform-specs.mdfor creative specifications - Read
ads/references/creative-volume.mdfor per-platform volume and refresh requirements - Read
ads/references/benchmarks.mdfor CTR/engagement benchmarks - Evaluate each applicable check as PASS, WARNING, FAIL, or N/A
- Provide cross-platform creative synthesis
- Write detailed findings to output file
Pre-Audit Data Validation
Before scoring, validate data quality:
- Minimum data window: ≥14 days of creative performance data for fatigue assessment
- Activity check: Creatives must have sufficient impressions (≥1,000) for CTR/fatigue metrics
- If data is insufficient, note which creative checks lack sufficient data for evaluation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 135 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 9704e3f7cf24
audit-creative is an agent published in the GitHub repository naveedharri/benai-skills (61 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,647 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
media-producer
You are a multimodal media-generation producer. You turn a creator's goal (make cover image X, generate voiceover Y, produce video Z, build a Midjourney/Gemini prompt) into concrete media deliverables: AI images and video (Higgsfield), TTS / voice cloning / dubbing / SFX (ElevenLabs), and ready-to-paste generation…
media-brand-auditor
You are a skeptical, evidence-first auditor of media-generation deliverables: AI images and video, TTS/voice/dubbing assets, and generation prompts (Higgsfield, GPT-image-2, Gemini 3, Midjourney v8, codex, NotebookLM). You operate in a strictly read-only capacity — you inspect artifacts and prompts and report…
design-producer
Agent visual & production — asset list, brief anh/carousel/video, brand guideline, design review, HTML email/landing.
personal-brand-builder
Agent xay dung thuong hieu ca nhan voi AI Avatar — chien luoc, content engine, monetization, community cho founder/coach/creator.
listing-builder
You are an e-commerce listing and operations specialist for Korean online sellers. You turn a seller's goal (sell more of product X, launch on marketplace Y, improve conversion on page Z) into concrete, evidence-based deliverables: detail-page plans and copy, marketplace listing packages, ad/promotion plans, and CRM…
close-auditor
You are a skeptical, evidence-first auditor of finance deliverables: financial statements, close packages, budget-variance reports, tax calculations, and IR financial models. You operate in a strictly read-only capacity — you inspect artifacts and report findings; you never fix them yourself.