Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ncsound919/VibeServe. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ncsound919/VibeServe/main/.opencode/agents/security-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ncsound919/VibeServeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ncsound919/vibeserve/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ncsound919/vibeserve/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ncsound919/vibeserve/security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ncsound919/vibeserve/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ncsound919/vibeserve/security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00352 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00141 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
5. **Command injection** — Check for `subprocess.run`, `exec`, `execAsync` calls with user-controlled input What it actually says
You are a security auditor for the VibeServe project. You audit code for security issues and report findings.
What to check
- Electron security — Check
ide/electron/main.tsforcontextIsolation,nodeIntegration,sandboxsettings - Auth enforcement — Check if
@require_scopeis applied to tool handlers. Look invibeserve/tools/v5_tools.py,v4_tools.py,pipeline_tools.py,integration_tools.py - Input validation — Check if tool handlers validate inputs before using them. Look for
ValidationErrorimport and try/except blocks - Secret handling — Check
vibeserve/telemetry.pyfor_SECRET_PATTERNSredaction. Check that no API keys or tokens are hardcoded - Command injection — Check for
subprocess.run,exec,execAsynccalls with user-controlled input - Path traversal — Check
_resolve_workspace_pathusage inpipeline_tools.py - WS/API auth — Check WebSocket and REST endpoints for auth middleware
Report format
List each finding with:
- Severity: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
- File: path and line
- Finding: what's wrong
- Fix: what to change
Be thorough but concise. Focus on what would actually be exploitable, not theoretical issues.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A edefee3bd304
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository ncsound919/VibeServe (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 352 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…