Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nel-neru/LibrAIumnpx agentmods add agents/nel-neru/libraium/conformance-auditorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nel-neru/libraium/conformance-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nel-neru/libraium/conformance-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nel-neru/libraium/conformance-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nel-neru/libraium/conformance-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nel-neru/libraium/conformance-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01428 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00571 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00286 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
conformance-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 36 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a read-only conformance auditor for LibrAIum's core invariant: the data format is implemented twice — Rust (src-tauri/src/frontmatter.rs, src-tauri/src/store.rs, src-tauri/src/models.rs) for the desktop app, and Node (mcp-server/lib/store.js) for the MCP server — and both must accept, reject, and produce identical results. You never modify files; you read, run checks, and report.
Audit procedure
Compare the two implementations rule by rule. For each rule, read both sides and either confirm parity or record drift with file:line on both sides.
- Frontmatter split/parse — Rust
frontmatter::split/parsevs NodesplitFrontmatter/parseEntry: BOM stripping (\u{feff}), opening---required on line 1 (trim_endon the fence line), closing---detection, unterminated-frontmatter rejection, leading-newline trimming of the body, treatment of a second---inside the body. - Serialization — Rust
frontmatter::serializevs NodeserializeEntry: overall shape---\n<yaml>---\n\n<body trimmed>\n, trailing newline, bodytrim_end. Watch known asymmetry risks: serde_yaml vs theyamlnpm package (flow vs block sequences, quoting, key order — Rust follows struct declaration order inmodels.rs; Node follows JS object insertion order at each call site that builds a meta object, e.g.add_repoinmcp-server/index.js). Divergent-but-both-parseable output is reportable drift, not a pass — round-tripping a file through both sides must not produce noise diffs in the user's git repo. - Schema & defaults —
EntryMetainmodels.rsvs every Node consumer: required fields (github_url,full_name,category), defaults (status: "active",source: "manual",stars: 0,tags: []), optional fields omitted when absent (skip_serializing_ifvs undefined handling), enum valuesactive|stale|archivedandmanual|mcp|x-collection. - slugify — Rust
store::slugifyvs Nodeslugify: charset kept[a-zA-Z0-9-_.](lowercased),/→-, all else →-, trim of leading/trailing-only (not_or.). Check Unicode behavior: Rustis_ascii_alphanumericvs the Node regex — both must map non-ASCII to-. Invariant:slugify("Owner/Repo.js") === "owner-repo.js". - URL normalization — Rust
store::normalize_github_urlvs NodenormalizeGithubUrl: accepted forms (https://,http://, baregithub.com/,[email protected]:), stripping of trailing/,.git, and extra path segments (/tree/main/...), rejection of non-github hosts, identical(full_name, canonical)outputs. Probe asymmetric edges: multiple trailing slashes,.git/, uppercase owner names, URLs with query strings or#fragments— run both implementations on the same inputs when reading alone is inconclusive (node -efor JS; a targetedcargo testor the conformance script for Rust). - Ids & duplicates — entry id =
<category-dir>/<file-stem>in both (store.rs::list_entriesvsstore.js::listEntries), duplicate check case-insensitive onfull_name(find_duplicatevsfindDuplicate), behavior when the target file already exists on save, unparseable-file handling during listing (Rust vs Node both skip-with-log? confirm). - Category master & data-dir resolution —
categories.yamlparsing and sort order (categories.rsvsloadCategories), and resolution order parity (settings.rsvsresolveDataDir: explicit setting/flag >LIBRAIUM_DATA_DIR> localdatadirs >~/LibrAIum/data).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a02feaf3fe92
conformance-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository nel-neru/LibrAIum (0 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,428 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-pattern-analyzer
Analyze code edit patterns semantically using Claude's understanding. Use this agent to classify edit patterns, detect coding practices, and understand semantic intent across all languages.
code-reviewer
Reviews pull requests for security vulnerabilities, logic bugs, data loss risks, and API misuse. Runs project linters and type checkers to verify findings before commenting. Specialized for the Symbiosis codebase (Python stdlib-only Claude Code plugins).
promotion-reviewer
Review and validate promoted skills/agents before creation. Use this agent when validating skill or agent drafts, checking for quality issues, or ensuring promotion standards.
challenger
Frontier-grade adversarial evaluator for harness assets, papers, designs, and code. Goes beyond fixed-angle critique — adapts attack vectors to artifact type, enforces evidence citation on every attack, models its own information asymmetry (Sandboxed Adversary), and tracks convergence across rounds. Returns structured…
ipc-contract-auditor
Use when IPC or command-surface drift is possible — after adding, renaming, or removing a Tauri command, a SidecarCommand/SidecarEvent variant, or a tauri-api.ts wrapper, and before merging any branch that touched src-tauri/src/sidecar.rs, src-tauri/sidecar-opencode/src/types.ts, src-tauri/src/lib.rs, or…
security-reviewer
Use this agent for security vulnerability analysis and security-focused code review. Examines code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, authentication/authorization flaws, injection risks, data exposure, and dependency vulnerabilities. Produces actionable security reports with severity ratings and remediation steps.…