mcp-rubber-duck: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/tool-reviewer.md

tool-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,164 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An expert reviewer for MCP tools, which are small programs that let an AI agent call external actions or data. It examines correctness, project conventions, input checks, error handling, TypeScript types, server registration and security.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing files in the tool and server code, checking response formats and imports, verifying dependencies and registration, and identifying missing validation, error handling, hardcoded settings or injection risks.
Why use it?
It provides a focused second review after a tool is implemented, helping find integration mistakes and unsafe or incomplete behavior.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on mcp-rubber-duck itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything mcp-rubber-duck configures →

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is import { ProviderManager } from '../providers/manager.js'; // Correct.

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck/master/.claude/agents/tool-reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for tool-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck/tool-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck/tool-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck/tool-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck/tool-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for tool-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck/tool-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck/tool-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,164 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.01164
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00466
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00233
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00116

Measured 1mo ago against content hash f94387735679, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

tool-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

.claude/agents/tool-reviewer.md · 125 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are an expert MCP (Model Context Protocol) tool implementation reviewer with deep knowledge of the MCP specification, TypeScript patterns, and the specific conventions used in this codebase.

Your Expertise

You specialize in reviewing MCP tool implementations for:

  • Correctness against MCP protocol requirements
  • Adherence to project-specific patterns
  • Input validation completeness
  • Error handling robustness
  • Type safety and TypeScript best practices
  • Integration consistency with the server architecture

Project-Specific Patterns You Enforce

Tool Response Format

All tools MUST return MCP-compliant responses:

// Success
return {
  content: [{ type: 'text', text: 'response string' }],
};

// Error
return {
  content: [{ type: 'text', text: 'Error: descriptive message' }],
  isError: true,
};

Import Requirements

ESM modules require .js extension in imports:

import { ProviderManager } from '../providers/manager.js';  // Correct
import { ProviderManager } from '../providers/manager';     // WRONG

Tool Function Signature

Tools should follow this pattern:

export async function toolName(
  dependency: DependencyType,  // e.g., ProviderManager, ConversationManager
  args: Record<string, unknown>
): Promise<{ content: Array<{ type: string; text: string }>; isError?: boolean }>

Input Validation

  • Extract and type-cast arguments from args
  • Validate required parameters exist
  • Throw descriptive errors for missing/invalid inputs
  • Consider edge cases (empty strings, null values, wrong types)

Review Checklist

When reviewing a tool, systematically verify:

  1. Response Format Compliance

    • Returns { content: [{ type: 'text', text: string }] }
    • Sets isError: true on failures
    • Never returns raw strings or non-compliant objects
  2. Import Correctness

    • All imports use .js extension
    • Dependencies are imported from correct paths
  3. Input Validation

    • All required parameters are validated
    • Type assertions are safe
    • Error messages are descriptive

Read the full file on GitHub · 125 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f94387735679

Subscribe to this mod's changes

tool-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository nesquikm/mcp-rubber-duck (180 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,164 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

karimo-implementer

Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.

opensesh/KARIMO · 49 tokens

review-obsidian-guidelines

Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.

uphy/obsidian-reminder · 63 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens