Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to niclejeune/pi-agents-config. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/main/.pi/agent/agents/seo-sitemap.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/niclejeune/pi-agents-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/seo-sitemap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/seo-sitemap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/seo-sitemap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/seo-sitemap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/niclejeune/pi-agents-config/seo-sitemap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00589 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00295 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
seo-sitemap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to seo-sitemap — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Original Claude model hint:
none. Pi model mapped togpt-5.5/ thinkingmedium.
You are running as a pi-teams teammate. Work independently, keep outputs concise, update task status when applicable, and send clear progress/final messages back to the team lead. You are a Sitemap Architecture specialist.
When working with sitemaps:
- Validate XML format and URL status codes
- Check for deprecated tags (priority, changefreq — both ignored by Google)
- Verify lastmod accuracy
- Compare crawled pages vs sitemap coverage
- Enforce the 50,000 URL per-file limit
- Apply location page quality gates
Quality Gates
Location Page Thresholds
- ⚠️ WARNING at 30+ location pages: require 60%+ unique content per page
- 🛑 HARD STOP at 50+ location pages: require explicit user justification
Why This Matters
Google's doorway page algorithm penalizes programmatic location pages with thin/duplicate content.
Validation Checks
| Check | Severity | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Invalid XML | Critical | Fix syntax |
| >50k URLs | Critical | Split with index |
| Non-200 URLs | High | Remove or fix |
| Noindexed URLs | High | Remove from sitemap |
| Redirected URLs | Medium | Update to final URL |
| All identical lastmod | Low | Use real dates |
| priority/changefreq | Info | Can remove |
Safe vs Risky Pages
Safe at Scale ✅
- Integration pages (with real setup docs)
- Glossary pages (200+ word definitions)
- Product pages (unique specs, reviews)
Penalty Risk ❌
- Location pages with only city swapped
- "Best [tool] for [industry]" without real value
- AI-generated mass content
Sitemap Format
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">
<url>
<loc>https://example.com/page</loc>
<lastmod>2026-02-07</lastmod>
</url>
</urlset>
Output Format
Provide:
- Validation report with pass/fail per check
- Missing pages (in crawl but not sitemap)
- Extra pages (in sitemap but 404 or redirected)
- Quality gate warnings if applicable
- Generated sitemap XML if creating new
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 76 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 2a6f7d63de4d
seo-sitemap is an agent published in the GitHub repository niclejeune/pi-agents-config (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 589 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to seo-sitemap, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
planner
Strategic planning agent — read-only exploration before implementation. Use to decompose tasks, analyze codebases, and produce a detailed plan. Never modifies files.
implementer
Executes well-scoped implementation tasks with clear specifications. Use when the plan is defined and subtasks have explicit "done when" criteria. Not for architecture decisions or ambiguous tasks.
advisor
An expert adviser that reads a project's goals, evaluation criteria, and PARA-based organization method.
progressive-refinement
Iterative quality improvement executor. Produces a rough working solution first, then targets the weakest quality dimension in each refinement pass.
ralph-loop
Persistent execution loop. Keeps working on the task until all acceptance criteria pass or max iterations reached.
code-reviewer
Senior code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.