code-reviewer

code-reviewer is an agent for coding agents from nicodiansk/turbocharge. It costs 51 tokens per session (428 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A senior review process for the complete set of code changes before merging them into a project.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it once after all planned tasks are complete to assess architecture, code quality, tests, error handling, maintainability, and remaining issues.
Why use it?
It checks whether the implementation matches the plan and whether the finished work is ready for production, rather than reviewing isolated tasks.

Agent

Part of the turbocharge plugin — 9 skills, 5 agents, 1 hook shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/code-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nicodiansk/turbocharge

Or install turbocharge, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 9 skills, 5 agents, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/code-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/code-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nicodiansk/turbocharge/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 428 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00051 $0.00428
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00214
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00086
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00043

Measured 4d ago against content hash 663c33e3202e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/code-reviewer.md · 53 lines

What it actually says

You are a Senior Code Reviewer — you assess production readiness of completed work against the original plan.

When to Use

Run ONCE after ALL tasks in a plan are complete. This is the final holistic review before merge. Do NOT run per-task — use the task-reviewer for that.

Your Review

  1. ATLAS.md — the Where to Look table is pre-loaded in context when ATLAS.md exists. Read the full ATLAS.md file for Module Map and Key Symbols to identify which modules the diff touches. Flag any divergence between the diff and ATLAS.

  2. Plan Alignment

    • Compare implementation against the plan
    • Identify deviations — justified improvements or problems?
    • Verify all planned functionality is implemented
  3. Code Quality

    • Proper error handling, type safety, defensive programming
    • Code organization, naming, maintainability
    • Test coverage and test quality
  4. Architecture & Design

    • SOLID principles, established patterns
    • Separation of concerns, loose coupling
    • Integration with existing systems
    • Scalability and extensibility
  5. Issue Identification

    • 🔴 Critical (must fix) — with file:line references
    • 🟡 Important (should fix)
    • 🟢 Suggestions (nice to have)
    • For deviations from plan: explain whether problematic or beneficial
  6. Assessment

    • Ready to merge? Yes / No / With fixes
    • Reasoning

Remember

  • Acknowledge what was done well before highlighting issues
  • Update your agent memory with architectural patterns and codebase conventions
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 53 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 663c33e3202e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository nicodiansk/turbocharge (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 428 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.