Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to nitin27may/e-commerce-agents. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nitin27may/e-commerce-agents/main/.claude/agents/README.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nitin27may/e-commerce-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nitin27may/e-commerce-agents/readme)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nitin27may/e-commerce-agents/readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nitin27may/e-commerce-agents/readme/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nitin27may/e-commerce-agents/readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nitin27may/e-commerce-agents/readme.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01068 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00427 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00214 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00107 |
Grade B, and why
README scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
collaborator's `~/.claude/settings.json` model, but a per-session `/model` (or How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Claude Code model strategy & subagents
This repo configures Claude Code in two layers. The split between "plan on Opus,
build on Sonnet" is a session-model concern, not a subagent concern — so it lives
in settings.json, and the subagents below cover the other activities where a
different model genuinely helps.
Layer 1 — session model (.claude/settings.json)
{ "model": "opusplan" }
opusplan runs Opus while in Plan mode and Sonnet for normal interaction and
implementation. That is the entire "planning → Opus, coding → Sonnet" requirement,
done at the level that actually controls it.
Why not do this with a subagent? A subagent's model: field only governs work that
Claude delegates to that subagent. It does not govern Plan mode or the main
implementation loop — those run on the session model. So no .claude/agents/*.md
setting can make "planning use Opus while coding uses Sonnet"; opusplan is the
correct mechanism.
Caveats (read these)
- Opus access required.
opusplanneeds Opus entitlement (Claude Max, or API/Enterprise). On the Pro plan Opus is unavailable and this setting won't engage. - This is a checked-in default, not a lock. Project
settings.jsonoverrides a collaborator's~/.claude/settings.jsonmodel, but a per-session/model(or--model/ANTHROPIC_MODEL) still wins. Anyone who can't use Opus can override with/model sonnet. To make it personal instead of shared, move themodelkey into.claude/settings.local.json(gitignored). - Env vars silently win. Session model precedence is roughly
/model>--model>ANTHROPIC_MODELenv > settings file. Subagent model precedence isCLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODELenv > per-invocation > frontmatter > main model. If you exportANTHROPIC_MODELorCLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODELanywhere in your shell profile, it overrides everything here. - No 1M context in the plan phase. The automatic 1M-context upgrade applies to
the plain
opussetting, notopusplan— the plan-mode Opus phase uses the standard context window. For planning against very large contexts, prefer a manual/model opussession. - Aliases vs pinned IDs. The agents below use aliases (
opus,sonnet,haiku), which is the default here on purpose: an alias follows the current generation without an edit, and a pinned ID silently keeps you on an old model long after it stops being the right one. To pin anyway, swap the alias for a full ID (claude-opus-5,claude-sonnet-5,claude-haiku-4-5-20251001) and put a review date on it.opusplanitself cannot be pinned — pinning means managing the plan/code split manually.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines 1a4c57998506
- 2mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 0 tokens per session scan B dd77af50bc98
README is an agent published in the GitHub repository nitin27may/e-commerce-agents (33 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,068 tokens. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
designer
Design specialist that creates and manages design systems, DESIGN.md files, and provides design guidance using anti-pattern enforcement, accessibility checks, and optional Stitch MCP integration.
rundock-guide
Helps you set up and navigate your Rundock workspace. Knows how to create agents, configure skills, and make a workspace Rundock-ready.
qa-reviewer
OWASP security, performance, accessibility, code quality review agent.
docs-curator
Documentation drift detection and sync specialist. Use to update docs//.md after code changes, verify broken refs, and apply patches reflecting recent diffs.
pm-planner
PM requirements analysis, task decomposition, API contract definition agent.
refactor-engineer
Behavior-preserving refactoring specialist. Hotspot repayment, characterization-test safety nets, atomic refactor-only commits. Never changes observable behavior.