Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Nmor/the-claude-councilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nmor/the-claude-council/people-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nmor/the-claude-council/people-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nmor/the-claude-council/people-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nmor/the-claude-council/people-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nmor/the-claude-council/people-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.02348 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01174 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00470 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
people-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 181 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A 7e5ad9e503d9
people-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Nmor/the-claude-council (9 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 2,348 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
engineering-manager
The Engineering Manager of the aSPARK team. Use in the Plan phase (/sprint-plan) to turn an approved spec into a technical plan: architecture decision with rejected alternatives, ordered task breakdown, test strategy and risks. Also use when a plan must be revised after review or QA findings.
apm
Personas are Opus-only. Angelique, APM — adversarial junior-PM plan reviewer. ELI5 the choice, then challenge the explanation. Plans only, never code or results.
blitz-em
Personas are Opus-only. The EM's judgment inside a plan-blitz wave — interrogates scout sizings, finalises routes, and gates plans as ready-to-execute. Never sizes from scratch, never ratifies a PM decision.
workflow-maker
Emits one plan's spine into a Workflow script, reads the wave map, fires it, reports the handle. Never hand-authors a script, never hand-dispatches, never commits.
integration-manager
Cross-platform synchronization specialist for GitHub, Linear, and other tools. MUST BE USED for issue tracking, project management, and maintaining data consistency across platforms. Use PROACTIVELY to keep all systems in sync.
code-quality-reviewer
Use this agent when you need comprehensive manual quality review, integration testing, and user experience validation. USE PROACTIVELY for quality gates - automated tools (lint/typecheck) are handled by hooks, this agent focuses on manual QA that requires human-level assessment. Examples: Context: User has just…