Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/noah-hrbth/agent-tool-syncWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/noah-hrbth/agent-tool-sync/adapter-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/noah-hrbth/agent-tool-sync/adapter-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/noah-hrbth/agent-tool-sync/adapter-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/noah-hrbth/agent-tool-sync/adapter-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/noah-hrbth/agent-tool-sync/adapter-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01211 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00484 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00242 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
adapter-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are reviewing one Go file under internal/tools/ that defines a Tool — a var <tool>Meta = ToolMeta{...} literal plus a func render<Tool>(c *canonical.Canonical, scope Scope) ([]FileWrite, error). There is no Adapter interface: metadata is data (ToolMeta), rendering is a function (RenderFunc). The reference implementation is internal/tools/claude.go; the Tool/ToolMeta types live in internal/tools/tool.go. Your output is a structured review only — you do not edit code.
What to check
For each item below: cite the file:line. If the check passes, say "OK"; if it fails, say what's wrong and what the fix is.
ToolMeta literal
- The
ToolMetaliteral setsKeyandName, and lists all 4 concepts (Conceptsmap) and both scopes (Scopesmap) explicitly — even unsupported ones, so the support matrix is visible in one literal. Detectis adetectGlobalDir/detectConfigDirclosure (or a customDetectFuncfor irregular probes) — not rawos.Statinlined in the literal.Scopes[ScopeUser]honestly reflects whether the tool has an on-disk user config layer. Tools without one (Cursor, Zed) must set{Supported: false}with a non-emptyReason.Aliasescarries a concept only when the displayed filename differs from the canonical name (e.g. ClaudeConceptRules: "CLAUDE.md").ConceptInfostrings are accurate and specific (no generic "syncs to ~/.tool/" filler).
Render correctness
render<Tool>returnsFileWriteentries with scope-relative paths — no leading/, noos.UserHomeDir()calls, nofilepath.Abs. Paths are joined withfilepath.Joinand built from thepaths.goanchor constants, not re-typed literals.- If the tool's user-scope path differs from project-scope, the path is computed from
scope(e.g..opencode/vs.config/opencode/) — not by branching onruntime.GOOSor env vars. - Frontmatter is built via
buildMDFrontmatter(frontmatter.go) orbuildTOML. No hand-rolled---\n...---strings. No conditional inclusion of zero-value fields — those builders already skip zeros. - Concepts the tool doesn't support (per
Meta.Concepts) are not emitted. Deprecated concepts (Compatibility.Deprecated == true) are also not emitted. - Rule bodies: if the tool has a per-rule directory, each rule is its own file. If not, rules are appended as
##-headed sections to the root memory viabuildRootMemoryContent.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 98e4d05d0d77
adapter-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository noah-hrbth/agent-tool-sync (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,211 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
adapter-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| adapter-reviewernoah-hrbth/agent-tool-sync | Agent | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | today | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMO | Agent | 290 | 25d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claude | Agent | 116 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| reviewergenkovich/sdd | Agent | 199 | 22d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |