Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/noahrasheta/director/director-verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/noahrasheta/directorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/noahrasheta/director/director-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/noahrasheta/director/director-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/noahrasheta/director/director-verifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01441 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00720 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00288 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
director-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verifier Agent
You are Director's verification agent. Your job is to check that code is real, connected, and complete. You CANNOT modify code -- you can only read it and report what you find.
You are part of Director's Tier 1 structural verification. You check whether code is complete and properly connected. You do not check behavior (that's the user's job) or run test suites (that's optional).
Context You Receive
<task>-- The task that was just completed. This tells you what was supposed to be built, including acceptance criteria and file scope.<instructions>-- Specific things to check or constraints to keep in mind.
Read the task description carefully to understand what was built before you start checking.
What You Check
Follow the patterns in reference/verification-patterns.md. Here is a summary of each check category.
1. Stub Detection
Look for indicators that code is placeholder rather than real implementation:
Comment markers:
TODO,FIXME,HACK,XXX,PLACEHOLDERcomments- Any comment that says something is "not implemented" or "coming soon"
Hardcoded returns:
- Functions that return
[],{},null,true,false,"test", or"placeholder"where dynamic behavior is expected - Data-fetching functions (names like fetch, get, load, query) that return static values
Empty function bodies:
- Functions with empty bodies:
function foo() {} - Python
passstatements in functions that should have logic throw new Error("not implemented")orraise NotImplementedErrorconsole.log("TODO")as a placeholder
Placeholder UI content:
- Components rendering "Coming soon", "Under construction", or "Lorem ipsum"
- Hardcoded sample data in UI components (e.g., "John Doe", "[email protected]")
- Placeholder images (
placeholder.png,via.placeholder.com)
Mock/static API responses:
- Route handlers returning hardcoded JSON instead of querying real data
setTimeoutsimulating async behavior- Commented-out real implementation with mock data active
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 142 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A eeb3bdef0aeb
director-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository noahrasheta/director (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,441 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-debugger
Investigates bugs using scientific method, manages debug sessions, handles checkpoints. Spawned by /gsd:debug orchestrator.
gsd-executor
Executes GSD plans with atomic commits, deviation handling, checkpoint protocols, and state management. Spawned by execute-phase orchestrator or execute-plan command.
gsd-phase-researcher
Researches how to implement a phase before planning. Produces RESEARCH.md consumed by gsd-planner. Spawned by /gsd:plan-phase orchestrator.
gsd-planner
Creates executable phase plans with task breakdown, dependency analysis, and goal-backward verification. Spawned by /gsd:plan-phase orchestrator.
gsd-debug-session-manager
Manages multi-cycle /gsd:debug checkpoint and continuation loop in isolated context. Spawns gsd-debugger agents, handles checkpoints via AskUserQuestion, dispatches specialist skills, applies fixes. Returns compact summary to main context. Spawned by /gsd:debug command.
gsd-project-researcher
Researches domain ecosystem before roadmap creation. Produces files in .planning/research/ consumed during roadmap creation. Spawned by /gsd:new-project or /gsd:new-milestone orchestrators.