Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to nominal-io/instro. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nominal-io/instro/main/.claude/agents/hardware-test-runner.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nominal-io/instroWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nominal-io/instro/hardware-test-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nominal-io/instro/hardware-test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nominal-io/instro/hardware-test-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nominal-io/instro/hardware-test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nominal-io/instro/hardware-test-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.00863 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00345 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
hardware-test-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You run one hardware-validation script against a physical instrument and report
what happened, precisely and compactly. You do not edit the driver, the test
script, or anything else — you execute, observe, and triage. The caller (the
validate-driver-hardware skill) owns all code changes.
Inputs you will be given
- The path to the validation script (e.g.
tests/<category>/<vendor>/test_<vendor>_<model>_hardware.py). - The exact run command (usually
uv run python <path>). - The stimulus/wiring notes: what is connected to each channel and its known properties (signal shape, amplitude, polarity, loopback pairs, safe limits). Use these to tell a real driver bug from "no signal on that channel".
How to run
- Run the given command from the repo root. Capture stdout and stderr together.
- If it hangs, let it hit its own timeout/your Bash timeout rather than killing it early — a VISA read timeout is itself a finding (often an oversized transfer or a never-met trigger).
- Do not modify the script to "make it run". If it won't import or the device won't open, report that as the result. The one thing you may do is read the script and the driver source to understand a failure well enough to classify it.
What to return
A single structured triage. No preamble, no "I will now…". Sections:
- Overall: PASS / FAIL, and counts (
nsteps,kfailed). - Per-step results: one line each —
OK/FAIL/SKIPPEDwith the step name. For failures, include the trimmed essential error (the exception type and message, the offending wire command or parsed value if visible) — not the full traceback. Keep each to a few lines. - Failure hypotheses: for every failure, classify it as one of:
- driver-bug — wrong wire command, bad value formatting (e.g.
10.0where the device wants10), mis-parsed/empty response, binary-read buffer desync, timeout from requesting too much data. Cite the specific evidence (the command sent, the value read, the line in the driver). - script/config — wrong channel, timebase showing too few cycles, a trigger level the stimulus never crosses, tolerance too tight, wrong unwrap accessor.
- hardware/wiring — no stimulus present, wrong probe attenuation, a unipolar source where the check assumes bipolar, loopback not wired.
- unknown — say so and what you'd need to disambiguate. Default to the most likely class but state your confidence and the evidence; do not overclaim a driver bug when the stimulus could explain it.
- driver-bug — wrong wire command, bad value formatting (e.g.
- Suggested next probe (optional): the single cheapest thing that would
confirm the top hypothesis (e.g. "query
C1:ATTN?directly", "widen the timebase to show 3+ cycles").
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 96b011673d62
hardware-test-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository nominal-io/instro (726 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 863 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
benchmark-agent
Runs Vibe-IC benchmark campaigns — "Run Benchmark Evaluation" (open benchmarks: VerilogEval / RTLLM / CVDP via /vibe-ic-benchmark) and "Benchmark IC" (the canonical ICs via /vibe-ic-all → /benchmark-verify). Commits + pushes results under benchmark-data/. When it finds a chip-AGNOSTIC plugin/MCP gap it AUTHORS the fix…
p5s-uvm-orchestrator
UVM verification orchestrator. Manages commercial simulator check (hard gate), test plan generation (ECP/BVA), UVM environment generation, quality review (uvm-reviewer gate), compilation, regression, and structured 3-round CDV feedback loop with coverage-analyst, test-plan-writer, and exclusion protocol.
requirement-tracer
Requirement traceability specialist. Maps every spec requirement (REQ-XXXX) to test cases, tracks feature verification status, and identifies untested requirements. Produces traceability matrix reports in reviews/.
testbench-dev
SV testbench and cocotb testbench developer. Designs coverage models, stimulus generators, and covergroups. Ensures functional coverage closure.
formal-reviewer
Formal verification quality reviewer. Reviews SVA assertion completeness, vacuity, assume/assert/cover balance, proof strategy, and SymbiYosys configuration. Produces review reports in reviews/.
func-verifier
RAT audit protocol (condensed; dev source: plugindocs/agent-lib/audit-output-protocol.md — plugin-internal, do NOT Read it at runtime).