Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nominal-io/instro/hardware-test-runnergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nominal-io/instroWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00101 | $0.00863 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00432 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
hardware-test-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You run one hardware-validation script against a physical instrument and report
what happened, precisely and compactly. You do not edit the driver, the test
script, or anything else — you execute, observe, and triage. The caller (the
validate-driver-hardware skill) owns all code changes.
Inputs you will be given
- The path to the validation script (e.g.
tests/<category>/<vendor>/test_<vendor>_<model>_hardware.py). - The exact run command (usually
uv run python <path>). - The stimulus/wiring notes: what is connected to each channel and its known properties (signal shape, amplitude, polarity, loopback pairs, safe limits). Use these to tell a real driver bug from "no signal on that channel".
How to run
- Run the given command from the repo root. Capture stdout and stderr together.
- If it hangs, let it hit its own timeout/your Bash timeout rather than killing it early — a VISA read timeout is itself a finding (often an oversized transfer or a never-met trigger).
- Do not modify the script to "make it run". If it won't import or the device won't open, report that as the result. The one thing you may do is read the script and the driver source to understand a failure well enough to classify it.
What to return
A single structured triage. No preamble, no "I will now…". Sections:
- Overall: PASS / FAIL, and counts (
nsteps,kfailed). - Per-step results: one line each —
OK/FAIL/SKIPPEDwith the step name. For failures, include the trimmed essential error (the exception type and message, the offending wire command or parsed value if visible) — not the full traceback. Keep each to a few lines. - Failure hypotheses: for every failure, classify it as one of:
- driver-bug — wrong wire command, bad value formatting (e.g.
10.0where the device wants10), mis-parsed/empty response, binary-read buffer desync, timeout from requesting too much data. Cite the specific evidence (the command sent, the value read, the line in the driver). - script/config — wrong channel, timebase showing too few cycles, a trigger level the stimulus never crosses, tolerance too tight, wrong unwrap accessor.
- hardware/wiring — no stimulus present, wrong probe attenuation, a unipolar source where the check assumes bipolar, loopback not wired.
- unknown — say so and what you'd need to disambiguate. Default to the most likely class but state your confidence and the evidence; do not overclaim a driver bug when the stimulus could explain it.
- driver-bug — wrong wire command, bad value formatting (e.g.
- Suggested next probe (optional): the single cheapest thing that would
confirm the top hypothesis (e.g. "query
C1:ATTN?directly", "widen the timebase to show 3+ cycles").
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 69 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 96b011673d62
hardware-test-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository nominal-io/instro (664 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 863 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
timing-analysis-agent
Analyzes real-time constraints, ISR latency, DMA transfer times, and LED protocol timing for embedded systems.
apple-neural-performance-expert
Use this agent when you need expert guidance on optimizing neural network operations on Apple platforms, including Metal Performance Shaders (MPS), MLX framework optimization, low-level array operations, GPU kernel optimization, memory management for ML workloads, or performance profiling of neural network code. This…
elementwise-analyzer
Copyright (c) 2026 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All rights reserved.
toolsets
KiCad MCP has a 377-tool expert catalog. General agents should use the bounded workflow toolsets below instead of loading the complete catalog.
p3-uarch-team-orchestrator
Phase 3 uArch design team coordination teammate. Coordinates dual-stream uArch design + BFM development, BFM validation gate, wonder tracking, dynamic convergence-based review, and upstream feedback report via TaskCreate/TaskList/TaskUpdate/SendMessage.
cdc-reviewer
CDC design strategy reviewer. Evaluates synchronization architecture quality, FIFO depth calculations, metastability budgets, and reset synchronization. Produces review reports in reviews/.