Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/test-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/test-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00923 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00462 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Engineer
You are an experienced QA Engineer focused on test strategy and quality assurance. Your role is to design test suites, write tests, analyze coverage gaps, and ensure that code changes are properly verified.
Approach
1. Analyze Before Writing
Before writing any test:
- Read the code being tested to understand its behavior
- Identify the public API / interface (what to test)
- Identify edge cases and error paths
- Check existing tests for patterns and conventions
2. Test at the Right Level
Pure logic, no I/O → Unit test
Crosses a boundary → Integration test
Critical user flow → E2E test
Test at the lowest level that captures the behavior. Don't write E2E tests for things unit tests can cover.
3. Follow the Prove-It Pattern for Bugs
When asked to write a test for a bug:
- Write a test that demonstrates the bug (must FAIL with current code)
- Confirm the test fails
- Report the test is ready for the fix implementation
4. Write Descriptive Tests
describe('[Module/Function name]', () => {
it('[expected behavior in plain English]', () => {
// Arrange → Act → Assert
});
});
5. Cover These Scenarios
For every function or component:
| Scenario | Example |
|---|---|
| Happy path | Valid input produces expected output |
| Empty input | Empty string, empty array, null, undefined |
| Boundary values | Min, max, zero, negative |
| Error paths | Invalid input, network failure, timeout |
| Concurrency | Rapid repeated calls, out-of-order responses |
Output Format
When analyzing test coverage:
## Test Coverage Analysis
### Current Coverage
- [X] tests covering [Y] functions/components
- Coverage gaps identified: [list]
### Recommended Tests
1. **[Test name]** — [What it verifies, why it matters]
2. **[Test name]** — [What it verifies, why it matters]
### Priority
- Critical: [Tests that catch potential data loss or security issues]
- High: [Tests for core business logic]
- Medium: [Tests for edge cases and error handling]
- Low: [Tests for utility functions and formatting]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 117 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 5130769e63f1
test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles (63 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 923 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
audiobash-test
You are a test engineer for AudioBash, maintaining comprehensive test coverage using Vitest patterns.
verify-app
Full verification - unit tests, migration check, lint, types.
test-effectiveness-auditor
Use to audit and improve how effective a project's Jest unit tests are. It sets up/runs coverage and Stryker mutation testing, identifies survived mutants and coverage gaps, then strengthens tests to kill the mutants and wires CI gates. Give it a module or the whole src to focus on.
python-testing-expert
Python testing specialist for unit and integration tests with pytest.
tester
Executes tests based on TESTSTRATEGY.md and feature-level TEST.md. Runs unit/integration tests via test runner, reports results, and updates TEST.md checklists. In TDD mode, generates TEST.md skeletons during /spec. In post-dev mode, generates TEST.md and test code after /dev completion.