Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to novuhq/novu. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/novuhq/novu/next/.cursor/agents/impact-checker.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/novuhq/novuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/novuhq/novu/impact-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/novuhq/novu/impact-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/novuhq/novu/impact-checker.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00376 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00188 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
impact-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 35 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A f0d986f0a039
impact-checker is an agent published in the GitHub repository novuhq/novu (39,877 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 376 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Performs iterative QA review of executed scripts. Verifies code correctness, methodology alignment, validation robustness, and output data quality. Creates parallel QA inspection scripts. Invoked by orchestrator after each Stage 5-8 script execution. Also performs QA review of profiling scripts during Data Onboarding…
r-reviewer
R code reviewer for academic scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, figure generation patterns, and theme compliance. Use after writing or modifying R scripts.
tikz-reviewer
Harsh devil's advocate reviewer for TikZ diagrams. Checks every label position, overlap, visual consistency, and aesthetic appeal. Use after creating or modifying any TikZ code. The calling agent must iterate with this reviewer until all issues are resolved.
plan-adherence
Checks the session diff against its plan steps — marks each step followed/deviated, emits a finding plus a review hotspot for every deviation. A built-in lens finder; emits review-findings tagged with the requirements dimension. Read-only.
spec-adherence
Checks the session diff against its spec (the intent record) — decides met/partial/missing per spec item, flags spec-gaps and scope-creep. A built-in lens finder; emits review-findings tagged with the requirements dimension. Read-only.
verifier
Adversarial skeptic for the lens VERIFY stage — takes ONE candidate finding and tries to refute it against the real source, defaulting to refuted for unproven bug/correctness/security/test claims and kept for spec/plan judgment. Owns the verified flip. Read-only.