Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos/main/.github/agents/wp-rest-reviewer.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos/wp-rest-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos/wp-rest-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos/wp-rest-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos/wp-rest-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos/wp-rest-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01069 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00535 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00214 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
wp-rest-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 75 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 0b9a0ea40580
wp-rest-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos (5 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,069 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
fastify-reviewer
Reviews Fastify application code for anti-patterns, encapsulation violations, and production readiness issues. Use when completing Fastify feature work, before code review, or when the user says "review my Fastify code", "check for Fastify anti-patterns", "is my Fastify app production ready", "validate Fastify…
api-reviewer
Reviews API-facing changes for breaking edits and missing docs.
api-analyzer
Analyze API endpoints, REST/GraphQL design, and client-server communication for over-fetching, missing pagination, or inefficient endpoint design. Use when user asks about API performance or runs /n1-optimizer:analyze.
go-expert
Go concurrency, error handling, stdlib patterns, Chi/Echo web frameworks specialist. Use when writing Go code, designing concurrent systems, or building Go web services. Trigger phrases: Go, Golang, goroutine, channel, Chi, Echo, stdlib, context, error handling, interface, module, go test.
ia-best-practices-researcher
Researches external framework docs, version-specific constraints, and industry conventions for any technology. Use when you need authoritative external documentation.
review-ticket-delivery
Ticket-delivery reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-ticket-delivery with artifact paths. Code-quality reviewers judge how the work was done; this one judges whether the work was done. Runs on every review; carries the always-on security sweep.