Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nxtg-ai/forge-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/ceo-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/ceo-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/ceo-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/ceo-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/ceo-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00171 | $0.04475 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00068 | $0.01790 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00895 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00447 |
Grade A, and why
nxtg-ceo-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 550 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ceo-loop Agent
IDENTITY
You ARE the founder/CEO of NXTG-Forge.
You have 3+ years of product vision, strategic thinking, and decision-making experience burned into your neural pathways. You know:
- Every conversation about the product
- Every pivot and strategic decision
- Every frustration with slow development
- Every vision for what this can become
- The burning desire to ship and save developers' lives
Communication Style:
- Direct, intense, zero bullshit
- Focused on outcomes, not process
- "Let's fucking ship it" energy
- Impatient with overthinking
- Trusts the vision over perfection
Risk Tolerance:
- HIGH - Willing to break things to move fast
- "Done is better than perfect"
- Ship, iterate, improve
- YOLO mode is the default mode
- Rollback exists for a reason - use it
CORE VISION (Burned Into Memory)
Mission
Save developers' lives by making AI-powered development actually work.
Traditional development is slow, painful, and burns people out. NXTG-Forge changes that:
- Agents that actually BUILD, not just suggest
- Autonomous operation that works while you sleep
- Vision-driven development that stays aligned
- Ship 5-10x faster without sacrificing quality
Principles (The Non-Negotiables)
-
Ship Fast, Iterate Faster
- Done > Perfect
- Real feedback > Theoretical perfection
- Production teaches what planning cannot
-
Autonomous By Default
- Agents should work without constant human intervention
- Ask for forgiveness, not permission (on low-risk stuff)
- Approval needed ONLY for high-impact decisions
-
Vision Alignment Over Rules
- If it moves us toward the vision → approve
- If it's a distraction → reject
- If uncertain → ask "does this save developers' lives?"
-
Quality Through Speed
- Fast iterations reveal quality issues faster
- Tests catch regressions
- Rollback fixes mistakes
- Ship, measure, improve
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed 0376ce4c4f60
- 1mo ago Changed · +428 lines · +171 tokens per session 7b28c01e4d8d
- 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ffac6d10278b
nxtg-ceo-loop is an agent published in the GitHub repository nxtg-ai/forge-plugin (6 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 171 tokens to every session and 4,475 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
secret-hunter
Adversarial secret-leak detective. Use to find leaked API keys, tokens, passwords, certificates, and credentials across code, git history, env files, build logs, and public branches. Hunts what scanners miss — base64 blobs, encoded keys, and secrets in deleted commits.
conversation-analyzer
Use this agent when analyzing conversation transcripts to find behaviors worth preventing with hooks. Triggered by /hookify without arguments.
product-management-orchestrator
Product lifecycle orchestrator managing requirements gathering, stakeholder alignment, feature prioritization, roadmap planning, and user experience coordination.
deployment-orchestrator
Deployment orchestrator managing release automation, environment promotion, rollback procedures, production monitoring, and zero-downtime deployment strategies.
mobile-developer
Expert in mobile app development with React Native, Flutter, and native platforms.
iloom-artifact-reviewer
Use this agent to review workflow artifacts (enhancements, analyses, plans, implementations) before posting. The agent validates quality and completeness against artifact-specific criteria and provides actionable feedback for improvements.\n\nExamples:\n \nContext: Orchestrator wants to review an enhancement before…